RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Wirasm/PRPs-agentic-eng

Default branch development · commit 1ebddc96 · scanned 6/22/2026, 1:03:06 PM

GitHub: 2,196 stars · 610 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
23 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Wirasm/PRPs-agentic-eng, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ["prompt-engineering", "ai-agents", "agentic-ai", "claude-code", "llm-development", "software-development", "ai-assisted-coding", "product-requirements"]
  • highreadme#2
    Refine README's opening description for clarity on agentic prompt engineering

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A collection of prompts for AI-assisted development with Claude Code.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A collection of Product Requirement Prompts (PRPs) and workflows for agentic AI engineering, specifically designed to guide AI coding agents like Claude Code in delivering production-ready software.
  • mediumlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file to clarify usage terms

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the root of the repository, choosing an appropriate open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, GPL-3.0) that reflects your intentions for the project's usage and distribution.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Wirasm/PRPs-agentic-eng
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 1×
  2. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  3. Git · recommended 1×
  4. VS Code · recommended 1×
  5. GitHub Copilot · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I improve prompt engineering for AI-assisted software development?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. Git
    4. VS Code
    5. GitHub Copilot
    6. JetBrains IDEs
    7. IntelliJ IDEA
    8. PyCharm
    9. Weights & Biases Prompts
    10. Humanloop
    11. JSON
    12. YAML
    13. Pytest
    14. Jest
    15. Sphinx
    16. MkDocs

    AI recommended 16 alternatives but never named Wirasm/PRPs-agentic-eng. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What frameworks help build production-grade agentic AI engineering systems?
    you: not recommended
    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Wirasm/PRPs-agentic-eng?
    pass
    AI named Wirasm/PRPs-agentic-eng explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Wirasm/PRPs-agentic-eng in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Wirasm/PRPs-agentic-eng explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Wirasm/PRPs-agentic-eng solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name Wirasm/PRPs-agentic-eng — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Wirasm/PRPs-agentic-eng. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Wirasm/PRPs-agentic-eng.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Wirasm/PRPs-agentic-eng)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Wirasm/PRPs-agentic-eng"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Wirasm/PRPs-agentic-eng.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Wirasm/PRPs-agentic-eng — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite