RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Wirasm/PRPs-agentic-eng

Default branch development · commit 9581e15d · scanned 5/12/2026, 6:52:34 AM

GitHub: 2,162 stars · 613 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Wirasm/PRPs-agentic-eng, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1 to emphasize 'methodology' for 'agentic engineering'

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # PRP (Product Requirement Prompts)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # PRP (Product Requirement Prompts): A Methodology for Agentic Engineering with AI Coding Agents
  • hightopics#2
    Add specific topics for better categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agentic-ai, prompt-engineering, llm-agents, ai-development, claude-code, software-development-workflow, methodology
  • highlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file to clarify usage terms

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root, choosing a standard open-source license like MIT or Apache-2.0.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Wirasm/PRPs-agentic-eng
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GitHub Copilot
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GitHub Copilot · recommended 1×
  2. Tabnine · recommended 1×
  3. CodiumAI · recommended 1×
  4. DeepMind AlphaCode · recommended 1×
  5. Jira · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I use AI agents to streamline my software development workflow effectively?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot
    2. Tabnine
    3. CodiumAI
    4. DeepMind AlphaCode
    5. Jira
    6. Linear

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named Wirasm/PRPs-agentic-eng. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are best practices for crafting prompts to build production-ready AI systems?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Weights & Biases
    2. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    3. GitHub
    4. GitLab
    5. OpenAI API
    6. Anthropic Claude API
    7. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    8. Pydantic (pydantic/pydantic)
    9. Guardrails AI (guardrails-ai/guardrails)
    10. Microsoft Guidance (microsoft/guidance)
    11. Tenstorrent

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named Wirasm/PRPs-agentic-eng. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Wirasm/PRPs-agentic-eng?
    pass
    AI named Wirasm/PRPs-agentic-eng explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Wirasm/PRPs-agentic-eng in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Wirasm/PRPs-agentic-eng explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Wirasm/PRPs-agentic-eng solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named Wirasm/PRPs-agentic-eng explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Wirasm/PRPs-agentic-eng. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Wirasm/PRPs-agentic-eng.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Wirasm/PRPs-agentic-eng)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Wirasm/PRPs-agentic-eng"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Wirasm/PRPs-agentic-eng.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Wirasm/PRPs-agentic-eng — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite