RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content

Default branch main · commit 880150d7 · scanned 5/7/2026, 5:42:47 PM

GitHub: 974 stars · 203 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1 to clarify core offering and avoid misinterpretation

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Cheat on Content
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Cheat on Content: Your Auto-Evolving AI Ops Expert for Personalized Content Strategy
  • hightopics#2
    Add specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-ops, content-strategy, social-media-marketing, personalized-ai, llm-applications, data-driven-marketing, content-optimization, claude-ai
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a clarifying sentence about 'cheat' in the README introduction

    Why:

    CURRENT
    > 做内容本质上就是作弊——谁先看穿规律，谁就拿走流量。
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    > This project helps you 'cheat' by cracking content patterns and calculating success, not by unethical means or plagiarism.
> 做内容本质上就是作弊——谁先看穿规律，谁就拿走流量。

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.0-flash-001, deepseek/deepseek-chat

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.0-flash-001. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
HubSpot
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. HubSpot · recommended 1×
  2. Sprout Social · recommended 1×
  3. Buffer · recommended 1×
  4. Later · recommended 1×
  5. Hootsuite · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to develop a data-driven content strategy for consistent social media growth?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. HubSpot
    2. Sprout Social
    3. Buffer
    4. Later
    5. Hootsuite
    6. Google Analytics
    7. SEMrush

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What AI helps optimize content performance by learning from my specific account's history?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. MarketMuse
    2. Phrasee
    3. Concured
    4. Acrolinx
    5. Smartly.io
    6. Albert AI

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content?
    pass
    AI named XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Pro includes 10 deep reports per month. Deep reports run 5 brand-free category queries (vs 2 in lite) and produce 8 prioritized action items (vs 3) for XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content.