RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content

Default branch main · commit 880150d7 · scanned 5/8/2026, 6:37:26 AM

GitHub: 1,075 stars · 230 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

4 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a clear subtitle to the README H1 to specify its unique function

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Cheat on Content
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Cheat on Content

> Your auto-evolving AI ops expert for content, learning YOUR account's unique patterns to predict success.
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-content-strategy, content-optimization, social-media-analytics, machine-learning, content-prediction, influencer-marketing, generative-ai, claude-code
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository settings

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a relevant URL to the 'Homepage' field in the repository settings (e.g., a project page, demo, or detailed landing page).

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Sprout Social
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Sprout Social · recommended 1×
  2. Brandwatch · recommended 1×
  3. Buffer Analyze · recommended 1×
  4. Hootsuite Analytics · recommended 1×
  5. Facebook Insights · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I analyze my social media content performance to predict future success?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Sprout Social
    2. Brandwatch
    3. Buffer Analyze
    4. Hootsuite Analytics
    5. Facebook Insights
    6. Twitter Analytics
    7. LinkedIn Analytics
    8. Instagram Insights
    9. TikTok Analytics
    10. Google Analytics
    11. Tableau
    12. Power BI

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking an AI tool that learns my specific content strategy, not just generic advice.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Surfer SEO
    2. MarketMuse
    3. Clearscope
    4. Frase.io
    5. Writer
    6. Jasper

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content?
    pass
    AI named XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content — RepoGEO report