RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

bowang-lab/scGPT

Default branch main · commit cebd6fae · scanned 5/15/2026, 3:22:01 PM

GitHub: 1,562 stars · 333 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
87 /100
Healthy
Category recall
2 / 2
Avg rank #1.0 when recommended
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface bowang-lab/scGPT, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Add a concise "About" description

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A foundation model for single-cell multi-omics data analysis using generative AI, pre-trained on massive single-cell RNA-seq datasets.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Expand repository topics for better specificity

    Why:

    CURRENT
    foundation-model, gpt, single-cell
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    foundation-model, gpt, single-cell, multi-omics, generative-ai, transformer, rna-seq, computational-biology
  • lowreadme#3
    Reorganize README to prioritize core value over updates

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The "UPDATE" section appears immediately after the initial project description and links.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Move the `!UPDATE` section and subsequent dated updates to a dedicated 'News' or 'Changelog' section further down the README, after the main introduction, features, and installation instructions.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
2 / 2
100% of queries surface bowang-lab/scGPT
Avg rank
#1.0
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
14%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Geneformer
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Geneformer · recommended 2×
  2. scVI · recommended 1×
  3. MultiVI · recommended 1×
  4. MOFA+ · recommended 1×
  5. PyTorch · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to apply generative AI foundation models to single-cell multi-omics data analysis?
    you: #1
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. scGPT ← you
    2. Geneformer
    3. scVI
    4. MultiVI
    5. MOFA+
    6. PyTorch
    7. TensorFlow
    8. Hugging Face Transformers
    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best deep learning models for zero-shot learning in single-cell biology?
    you: #1
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. scGPT ← you
    2. Geneformer
    3. scVI-tools
    4. UniPort
    5. Seurat
    6. CellPLM
    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of bowang-lab/scGPT?
    pass
    AI named bowang-lab/scGPT explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts bowang-lab/scGPT in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named bowang-lab/scGPT explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo bowang-lab/scGPT solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named bowang-lab/scGPT explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of bowang-lab/scGPT. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/bowang-lab/scGPT.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/bowang-lab/scGPT)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/bowang-lab/scGPT"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/bowang-lab/scGPT.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

bowang-lab/scGPT — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite