REPOGEO REPORT · LITE
juliye2025/evil-read-arxiv
Default branch main · commit 31bca2e5 · scanned 7/4/2026, 2:41:18 AM
GitHub: 1,475 stars · 151 forks
Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.
2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).
Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface juliye2025/evil-read-arxiv, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.
The category visibility step did not produce results for this scan (the LLM may have been unreachable). Re-run the diagnosis to get the full GEO picture.
Objective checks
Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.
- Metadata completenessfail
Suggestion:
- README presencepass
Self-mention check
Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?
- Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of juliye2025/evil-read-arxiv?skippedAI did not name juliye2025/evil-read-arxiv — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- If a team adopts juliye2025/evil-read-arxiv in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?skippedAI did not name juliye2025/evil-read-arxiv — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- In one sentence, what problem does the repo juliye2025/evil-read-arxiv solve, and who is the primary audience?skippedAI did not name juliye2025/evil-read-arxiv — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
Embed your GEO score
Drop this badge into the README of juliye2025/evil-read-arxiv. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.
Live preview[](https://repogeo.com/en/r/juliye2025/evil-read-arxiv)<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/juliye2025/evil-read-arxiv"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/juliye2025/evil-read-arxiv.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses
juliye2025/evil-read-arxiv — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.
- Deep reports10 / month
- Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
- Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite