juliye2025/evil-read-arxiv

• highreadme#1

  Reposition the README's opening to clarify its core function

  Why:

  CURRENT

  # evil-read-arxiv
  
  > 邪修的论文阅读工作流 - 自动化论文搜索、推荐、分析和整理
  
  ## 语言 / Language
  
  - [中文版](README.md)
  - [English Version](README_en.md)
  
  ## 简介
  
  这是一套 Claude Code 技能（Skills）集合，用于自动化研究论文的搜索、推荐、分析和整理工作流。通过调用 arXiv 和 Semantic Scholar API，每天为你推荐高质量论文，并自动生成详细笔记和关系图谱。

  COPY-PASTE FIX

  Copy

  # evil-read-arxiv: AI-Powered Research Paper Workflow (Claude + Next.js)
  
  > 自动化论文搜索、推荐、分析和整理，专为研究人员打造的 Claude Code 技能集合。
  
  ## 语言 / Language
  
  - [中文版](README.md)
  - [English Version](README_en.md)
  
  ## 简介
  
  **evil-read-arxiv** 是一套强大的 Claude Code 技能（Skills）集合，旨在为研究人员提供一个全自动化的论文搜索、推荐、分析和整理工作流。它通过调用 arXiv 和 Semantic Scholar API，每天为你推荐高质量论文，并自动生成详细笔记和关系图谱。

  OpenDoneDismiss
• hightopics#2

  Add relevant topics to improve categorization

  Why:

  COPY-PASTE FIX

  Copy

  ai-research-assistant, paper-reading, academic-workflow, claude-ai, arxiv, semantic-scholar, nextjs, llm, research-automation, knowledge-management

  OpenDoneDismiss
• highlicense#3

  Add a LICENSE file to the repository

  Why:

  COPY-PASTE FIX

  Copy

  Create a LICENSE file in the root of the repository. A common choice for open-source projects is the MIT License, but choose one that best fits your project's needs.

  OpenDoneDismiss

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

• CATEGORY QUERY

  What tools can automate my research paper discovery, analysis, and note-taking with AI?

  you: not recommended
  AI recommended (in order):

  1. Elicit
  2. Semantic Scholar
  3. Scite.ai
  4. ResearchRabbit
  5. Connected Papers
  6. Paperpile
  7. ChatGPT/Claude

  AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named juliye2025/evil-read-arxiv. This is the gap to close.

  Show full AI answer
• CATEGORY QUERY

  Seeking a system for daily academic paper recommendations and detailed AI-generated insights.

  you: not recommended
  AI recommended (in order):

  1. Elicit
  2. ResearchRabbit
  3. Connected Papers
  4. Semantic Scholar
  5. Scite.ai
  6. Paperpile
  7. Google Scholar Alerts

  AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named juliye2025/evil-read-arxiv. This is the gap to close.

  Show full AI answer

• Metadata completeness

  fail

  Suggestion:

• README presence

  pass

• Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of juliye2025/evil-read-arxiv?

  pass
  ⚠AI did not name juliye2025/evil-read-arxiv — likely talking about a different project

  AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

• If a team adopts juliye2025/evil-read-arxiv in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?

  pass
  ✓AI named juliye2025/evil-read-arxiv explicitly

  AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

• In one sentence, what problem does the repo juliye2025/evil-read-arxiv solve, and who is the primary audience?

  pass
  ✓AI named juliye2025/evil-read-arxiv explicitly

  AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?