RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

m1guelpf/auto-commit

Default branch main · commit 66e0c866 · scanned 5/12/2026, 1:07:58 PM

GitHub: 1,228 stars · 62 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface m1guelpf/auto-commit, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    git, commit, ai, openai, cli, rust, automation, developer-tools, gpt-3.5
  • mediumreadme#2
    Emphasize the 'end-to-end automation' differentiator in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section, e.g., `## Why auto-commit?` stating: `Unlike many tools that only generate commit messages, auto-commit fully automates the commit process from staged changes to a final commit, streamlining your workflow.`
  • lowhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Set the 'Homepage' field in your repository settings to a relevant URL (e.g., a project website, documentation, or even the GitHub repo itself if no other site exists).

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface m1guelpf/auto-commit
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
CommitSense
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. CommitSense · recommended 1×
  2. OpenAI GPT-3/GPT-4 · recommended 1×
  3. GitHub Copilot · recommended 1×
  4. commitizen · recommended 1×
  5. GitMind · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automatically generate Git commit messages from my staged changes?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. CommitSense
    2. OpenAI GPT-3/GPT-4
    3. GitHub Copilot
    4. commitizen
    5. GitMind

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named m1guelpf/auto-commit. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tool to automate commit message generation using AI for my development workflow?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Commitizen
    2. Git Commit AI
    3. CommitGPT
    4. AITable
    5. LazyCommit
    6. OpenAI API
    7. Hugging Face Transformers

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named m1guelpf/auto-commit. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of m1guelpf/auto-commit?
    pass
    AI named m1guelpf/auto-commit explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts m1guelpf/auto-commit in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named m1guelpf/auto-commit explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo m1guelpf/auto-commit solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named m1guelpf/auto-commit explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of m1guelpf/auto-commit. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/m1guelpf/auto-commit.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/m1guelpf/auto-commit)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/m1guelpf/auto-commit"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/m1guelpf/auto-commit.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

m1guelpf/auto-commit — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite