RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

m1guelpf/auto-commit

Default branch main · commit 66e0c866 · scanned 6/22/2026, 7:11:51 PM

GitHub: 1,223 stars · 62 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface m1guelpf/auto-commit, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • mediumreadme#1
    Update README H1 to explicitly state AI and Git focus

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Automagically-generated commit messages
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # auto-commit: AI-Powered Git Commit Message Generator
  • lowhomepage#2
    Add the repository URL as the homepage

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/m1guelpf/auto-commit

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface m1guelpf/auto-commit
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Zhengqbbb/cz-git
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Zhengqbbb/cz-git · recommended 1×
  2. OpenAI API · recommended 1×
  3. The-Commit-Company/GitMind · recommended 1×
  4. OpenAI's GPT · recommended 1×
  5. gpt-3.5-turbo · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automatically generate git commit messages using artificial intelligence?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. cz-git (Zhengqbbb/cz-git)
    2. OpenAI API
    3. GitMind (The-Commit-Company/GitMind)
    4. OpenAI's GPT
    5. gpt-3.5-turbo
    6. gpt-4
    7. GitHub Copilot
    8. Git Commit AI (Nutlope/git-commit-ai)
    9. LazyGit (jesseduffield/lazygit)

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named m1guelpf/auto-commit. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What command line tools help generate descriptive commit messages from my code changes?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Commitizen
    2. git-cz
    3. cz-cli
    4. Commitlint
    5. commit-gpt
    6. git-ai-commit
    7. git-autocommit
    8. git-cz-emoji

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named m1guelpf/auto-commit. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of m1guelpf/auto-commit?
    pass
    AI named m1guelpf/auto-commit explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts m1guelpf/auto-commit in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named m1guelpf/auto-commit explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo m1guelpf/auto-commit solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named m1guelpf/auto-commit explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of m1guelpf/auto-commit. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/m1guelpf/auto-commit.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/m1guelpf/auto-commit)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/m1guelpf/auto-commit"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/m1guelpf/auto-commit.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

m1guelpf/auto-commit — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite