RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

microsoft/BioGPT

Default branch main · commit 648f7d65 · scanned 5/14/2026, 11:36:35 PM

GitHub: 4,487 stars · 482 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
64 /100
Needs work
Category recall
1 / 2
Avg rank #1.0 when recommended
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface microsoft/BioGPT, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Add a concise repository description

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) model specifically designed for biomedical text generation, mining, and natural language processing on medical research papers.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Enhance README's opening sentence to include broader NLP tasks

    Why:

    CURRENT
    This repository contains the implementation of BioGPT: Generative Pre-trained Transformer for Biomedical Text Generation and Mining, by Renqian Luo, Liai Sun, Yingce Xia, Tao Qin, Sheng Zhang, Hoifung Poon and Tie-Yan Liu.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This repository contains the implementation of BioGPT: a Generative Pre-trained Transformer for Biomedical Text Generation, Mining, and Natural Language Processing (NLP) on medical research papers, by Renqian Luo, Liai Sun, Yingce Xia, Tao Qin, Sheng Zhang, Hoifung Poon and Tie-Yan Liu.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
1 / 2
50% of queries surface microsoft/BioGPT
Avg rank
#1.0
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
8%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
PubMedBERT
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. PubMedBERT · recommended 2×
  2. ClinicalBERT · recommended 2×
  3. SciBERT · recommended 2×
  4. GatorTron · recommended 2×
  5. BioLinkBERT · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best transformer models for generating and analyzing biomedical text data?
    you: #1
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. BioGPT ← you
    2. PubMedBERT
    3. BioLinkBERT
    4. ClinicalBERT
    5. SciBERT
    6. GatorTron
    7. Med-PaLM 2
    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    I need a pre-trained language model for natural language processing on medical research papers.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. BioBERT
    2. PubMedBERT
    3. ClinicalBERT
    4. SciBERT
    5. GatorTron
    6. BioMegatron

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named microsoft/BioGPT. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of microsoft/BioGPT?
    pass
    AI named microsoft/BioGPT explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts microsoft/BioGPT in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named microsoft/BioGPT explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo microsoft/BioGPT solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named microsoft/BioGPT explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of microsoft/BioGPT. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/microsoft/BioGPT.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/microsoft/BioGPT)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/microsoft/BioGPT"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/microsoft/BioGPT.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

microsoft/BioGPT — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite