RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

microsoft/BioGPT

Default branch main · commit 648f7d65 · scanned 6/25/2026, 1:57:09 PM

GitHub: 4,489 stars · 483 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
64 /100
Needs work
Category recall
1 / 2
Avg rank #1.0 when recommended
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface microsoft/BioGPT, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Add a concise description to the repository's About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    BioGPT is a Generative Pre-trained Transformer for biomedical text generation, mining, and analysis, specialized for understanding and extracting insights from biological literature.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Enhance the README's opening to explicitly highlight 'analysis and insight extraction'

    Why:

    CURRENT
    This repository contains the implementation of BioGPT: Generative Pre-trained Transformer for Biomedical Text Generation and Mining, by Renqian Luo, Liai Sun, Yingce Xia, Tao Qin, Sheng Zhang, Hoifung Poon and Tie-Yan Liu.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This repository contains the implementation of BioGPT: a Generative Pre-trained Transformer for biomedical text generation, mining, and analysis, designed to understand and extract insights from biological literature.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
1 / 2
50% of queries surface microsoft/BioGPT
Avg rank
#1.0
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
8%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
PubMedBERT
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. PubMedBERT · recommended 2×
  2. Guanaco · recommended 1×
  3. LLaMA 2 · recommended 1×
  4. Flan-T5 · recommended 1×
  5. GPT-2 · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best open-source models for generating biomedical research text?
    you: #1
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. BioGPT ← you
    2. PubMedBERT
    3. Guanaco
    4. LLaMA 2
    5. Flan-T5
    6. GPT-2
    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    I need a pre-trained transformer for analyzing and extracting insights from biological literature.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. BioBERT
    2. PubMedBERT
    3. SciBERT
    4. ClinicalBERT
    5. BioMegatron
    6. GeneBERT

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named microsoft/BioGPT. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of microsoft/BioGPT?
    pass
    AI named microsoft/BioGPT explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts microsoft/BioGPT in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named microsoft/BioGPT explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo microsoft/BioGPT solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named microsoft/BioGPT explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of microsoft/BioGPT. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/microsoft/BioGPT.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/microsoft/BioGPT)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/microsoft/BioGPT"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/microsoft/BioGPT.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

microsoft/BioGPT — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite