RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

openclaw/lobster

Default branch main · commit d9a0fe7e · scanned 6/22/2026, 8:02:02 AM

GitHub: 1,231 stars · 276 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface openclaw/lobster, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1 and opening sentence to clarify purpose for AI agents

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # 🦞 Lobster

An OpenClaw-native workflow shell: typed (JSON-first) pipelines, jobs, and approval gates.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # 🦞 Lobster: A Typed Workflow Shell for AI Agents

Lobster is an OpenClaw-native, local-first workflow shell and macro engine that turns skills/tools into composable pipelines and safe automations, enabling AI agents to call complex workflows in one step.
  • hightopics#2
    Add descriptive topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ["ai-agents", "workflow-engine", "orchestration", "llm-tools", "automation", "pipelines", "json-first", "openclaw"]
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a 'Why Lobster?' section to highlight differentiators

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section to the README, for example, under a heading like "Why Lobster? Differentiating from General Workflow Tools": "Lobster is specifically designed as a typed, local-first workflow shell for AI agents, enabling them to execute complex, resumable, and deterministic pipelines with a single call. Unlike general-purpose orchestrators like Prefect or Airflow, or LLM frameworks like LangChain, Lobster focuses on a JSON-first, macro-engine approach optimized for OpenClaw's ecosystem, providing granular control and approval gates directly within the agent's operational flow."

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface openclaw/lobster
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Prefect
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Prefect · recommended 2×
  2. Apache Airflow · recommended 2×
  3. Metaflow · recommended 2×
  4. LangChain · recommended 1×
  5. Kedro · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are good tools for building typed, composable workflow pipelines for AI agents?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. Prefect
    3. Apache Airflow
    4. Kedro
    5. Metaflow
    6. Pydantic
    7. ZenML

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named openclaw/lobster. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I create deterministic and resumable automations for AI assistant tasks?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Prefect
    2. Apache Airflow
    3. Temporal
    4. Metaflow
    5. Luigi
    6. Dagster

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named openclaw/lobster. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of openclaw/lobster?
    pass
    AI named openclaw/lobster explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts openclaw/lobster in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named openclaw/lobster explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo openclaw/lobster solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named openclaw/lobster explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of openclaw/lobster. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/openclaw/lobster.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/openclaw/lobster)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/openclaw/lobster"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/openclaw/lobster.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

openclaw/lobster — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite