RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

openclaw/lobster

Default branch main · commit e4514eca · scanned 5/12/2026, 1:52:05 AM

GitHub: 1,202 stars · 273 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface openclaw/lobster, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 and opening paragraph to clarify purpose for AI agents

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Lobster

An OpenClaw-native workflow shell: typed (JSON-first) pipelines, jobs, and approval gates.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Lobster: A Workflow Engine for AI Agents

Lobster is an OpenClaw-native workflow shell and local-first "macro engine" that turns skills/tools into composable pipelines and safe automations. It's designed for AI agents to call complex workflows in one step, providing typed (JSON-first) pipelines, jobs, and approval gates for robust and resumable automation.
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    workflow-engine, ai-agents, automation, pipelines, json-first, openclaw, workflow-orchestration, typed-workflows
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a 'Why Lobster?' section to the README for differentiation

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section to the README, for example:

## Why Lobster for AI Agents?

Unlike general-purpose workflow orchestrators, Lobster is purpose-built for AI agents like OpenClaw. It focuses on local-first, JSON-typed pipelines that allow agents to execute complex, multi-step automations deterministically and resumably, significantly reducing token usage and planning overhead.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface openclaw/lobster
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
temporalio/temporal
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. temporalio/temporal · recommended 1×
  2. apache/airflow · recommended 1×
  3. AWS Step Functions · recommended 1×
  4. PrefectHQ/prefect · recommended 1×
  5. Azure Logic Apps · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to build robust, resumable workflows for AI agents to automate complex tasks?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Temporal.io (temporalio/temporal)
    2. Apache Airflow (apache/airflow)
    3. AWS Step Functions
    4. Prefect (PrefectHQ/prefect)
    5. Azure Logic Apps
    6. Azure Durable Functions
    7. Kubeflow Pipelines (kubeflow/pipelines)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named openclaw/lobster. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a tool to define typed automation pipelines with approval steps.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Actions
    2. GitLab CI/CD
    3. Azure DevOps Pipelines
    4. Jenkins (jenkinsci/jenkins)
    5. CircleCI
    6. Argo Workflows (argoproj/argo-workflows)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named openclaw/lobster. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of openclaw/lobster?
    pass
    AI named openclaw/lobster explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts openclaw/lobster in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named openclaw/lobster explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo openclaw/lobster solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named openclaw/lobster explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of openclaw/lobster. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/openclaw/lobster.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/openclaw/lobster)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/openclaw/lobster"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/openclaw/lobster.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

openclaw/lobster — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite