RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

opencx-labs/copilot

Default branch main · commit 253cd328 · scanned 5/14/2026, 3:26:12 AM

GitHub: 5,117 stars · 402 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
23 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
0 pass · 2 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface opencx-labs/copilot, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Add a concise description to the repository's About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Experimental project for local-first, privacy-focused AI coding assistance within OpenCX workflows. No longer maintained, but useful as a reference.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add more specific topics to reflect its unique approach and status

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai-copilot, copilot, llm, sidekick
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-copilot, copilot, llm, sidekick, local-first, privacy, opencx, deprecated, reference-architecture

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface opencx-labs/copilot
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GitHub Copilot
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GitHub Copilot · recommended 2×
  2. Tabnine · recommended 2×
  3. Cursor · recommended 2×
  4. CodeWhisperer (Amazon Q Developer) · recommended 1×
  5. Jedi · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are good AI coding assistant tools for accelerating development workflows?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot
    2. Tabnine
    3. CodeWhisperer (Amazon Q Developer)
    4. Jedi
    5. IntelliCode
    6. Cursor
    7. Mutable.ai

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named opencx-labs/copilot. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an intelligent programming sidekick that leverages LLMs for code generation.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot
    2. Cursor
    3. Codeium
    4. Tabnine
    5. Amazon CodeWhisperer
    6. Google Gemini
    7. OpenAI API

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named opencx-labs/copilot. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    warn

    Suggestion:

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of opencx-labs/copilot?
    pass
    AI did not name opencx-labs/copilot — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts opencx-labs/copilot in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named opencx-labs/copilot explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo opencx-labs/copilot solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named opencx-labs/copilot explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of opencx-labs/copilot. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/opencx-labs/copilot.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/opencx-labs/copilot)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/opencx-labs/copilot"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/opencx-labs/copilot.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

opencx-labs/copilot — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite