RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

opencx-labs/copilot

Default branch main · commit 253cd328 · scanned 6/24/2026, 3:01:30 PM

GitHub: 5,113 stars · 400 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
0 pass · 2 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface opencx-labs/copilot, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Update README to clarify project purpose and maintenance status

    Why:

    CURRENT
    No longer maintained.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This project was an open-source, self-hosted tool designed to track and manage GitHub Copilot usage and associated costs. It is no longer actively maintained.
  • highabout#2
    Add a concise description to the About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    An open-source, self-hosted tool for tracking and managing GitHub Copilot usage and costs.
  • mediumtopics#3
    Refine topics to accurately reflect the project's function

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai-copilot, copilot, llm, sidekick
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    copilot-management, cost-management, self-hosted, usage-tracking, developer-tools

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface opencx-labs/copilot
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GitHub Copilot
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GitHub Copilot · recommended 2×
  2. Tabnine · recommended 2×
  3. Cursor · recommended 2×
  4. CodeWhisperer · recommended 1×
  5. davidhalter/jedi · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are some AI coding assistants to improve developer productivity for my workflow?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot
    2. Tabnine
    3. CodeWhisperer
    4. Cursor
    5. Jedi (davidhalter/jedi)
    6. IntelliCode

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named opencx-labs/copilot. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Which LLM-powered sidekick tools can assist with code generation and debugging tasks?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot
    2. Cursor
    3. Tabnine
    4. Amazon CodeWhisperer
    5. Google Gemini
    6. Cody by Sourcegraph

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named opencx-labs/copilot. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    warn

    Suggestion:

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of opencx-labs/copilot?
    pass
    AI named opencx-labs/copilot explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts opencx-labs/copilot in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named opencx-labs/copilot explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo opencx-labs/copilot solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named opencx-labs/copilot explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of opencx-labs/copilot. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/opencx-labs/copilot.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/opencx-labs/copilot)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/opencx-labs/copilot"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/opencx-labs/copilot.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

opencx-labs/copilot — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite