RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

uluckyXH/OpenMOSS

Default branch main · commit 98f76b83 · scanned 6/24/2026, 6:22:12 AM

GitHub: 1,284 stars · 146 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface uluckyXH/OpenMOSS, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a clear English positioning statement to the README's opening

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # OpenMOSS

<p align="center">
  
</p>

**OpenMOSS，可让多 Agent 自主运行的 AI 公司操作系统**
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # OpenMOSS
A self-organizing multi-agent collaboration platform, not an LLM.

<p align="center">
  
</p>

**OpenMOSS，可让多 Agent 自主运行的 AI 公司操作系统**
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    multi-agent, ai-agents, autonomous-agents, agent-platform, workflow-automation, generative-ai, openclaw
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add the repository URL as the project homepage

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/uluckyXH/OpenMOSS

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface uluckyXH/OpenMOSS
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
AutoGPT
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. AutoGPT · recommended 2×
  2. CrewAI · recommended 2×
  3. BabyAGI · recommended 2×
  4. Microsoft AutoGen · recommended 2×
  5. LangChain Agents · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I set up an autonomous multi-agent system for continuous task execution?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. AutoGPT
    2. CrewAI
    3. LangChain Agents
    4. Haystack Agents
    5. BabyAGI
    6. Microsoft AutoGen
    7. Open Interpreter

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named uluckyXH/OpenMOSS. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What platforms enable self-organizing AI teams to manage complex workflows autonomously?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. AutoGPT
    2. Microsoft AutoGen
    3. LangChain
    4. CrewAI
    5. BabyAGI
    6. Hugging Face Agents

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named uluckyXH/OpenMOSS. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of uluckyXH/OpenMOSS?
    pass
    AI did not name uluckyXH/OpenMOSS — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts uluckyXH/OpenMOSS in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named uluckyXH/OpenMOSS explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo uluckyXH/OpenMOSS solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name uluckyXH/OpenMOSS — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of uluckyXH/OpenMOSS. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/uluckyXH/OpenMOSS.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/uluckyXH/OpenMOSS)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/uluckyXH/OpenMOSS"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/uluckyXH/OpenMOSS.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

uluckyXH/OpenMOSS — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite