RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

uluckyXH/OpenMOSS

Default branch main · commit 98f76b83 · scanned 5/13/2026, 7:26:54 PM

GitHub: 1,261 stars · 146 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface uluckyXH/OpenMOSS, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a clear English positioning statement at the top of the README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # OpenMOSS
    
    <p align="center">
      
    </p>
    
    **OpenMOSS,可让多 Agent 自主运行的 AI 公司操作系统**
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # OpenMOSS
    
    A self-organizing multi-agent collaboration platform for OpenClaw. Multiple AI agents work as an autonomous team — planning, executing, reviewing, and patrolling tasks with zero human intervention.
    
    **OpenMOSS,可让多 Agent 自主运行的 AI 公司操作系统**
  • mediumcomparison#2
    Add a comparison section to key competitors

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## OpenMOSS vs. Competitors
    
    OpenMOSS differentiates itself from other multi-agent frameworks like CrewAI, AutoGen, and LangChain Agents by focusing on a fully autonomous, self-organizing 'AI company operating system' model. Key distinctions include:
    
    - **Zero Human Intervention:** Agents autonomously plan, execute, review, and patrol tasks without manual orchestration.
    - **Closed-Loop Quality Control:** Built-in review, scoring, and rework cycles ensure high-quality deliverables.
    - **Self-Healing & Monitoring:** A dedicated patrolling agent continuously monitors for stuck tasks and triggers automatic fixes, aiming for 0% agent 'mortality'.
    - **Performance-Driven:** Agents are incentivized with scores and rankings, directly linking review outcomes to performance.
    - **Skill Pluggability:** OpenMOSS handles scheduling and collaboration, while agent capabilities are determined by pluggable skills, adaptable to any business scenario.
    - **7x24 Cyclic Operations:** Supports recurring task types for continuous operations like daily content generation or data analysis.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface uluckyXH/OpenMOSS
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
CrewAI
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. CrewAI · recommended 2×
  2. OpenAI Assistants API · recommended 2×
  3. LangChain · recommended 1×
  4. LangSmith · recommended 1×
  5. AutoGen · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools enable autonomous AI agents to collaborate on tasks with built-in quality assurance?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LangSmith
    3. AutoGen
    4. CrewAI
    5. Haystack
    6. LlamaIndex
    7. OpenAI Assistants API

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named uluckyXH/OpenMOSS. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a platform for self-organizing AI agent teams to manage and monitor complex workflows.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. AutoGPT
    2. CrewAI
    3. LangChain Agents
    4. Microsoft AutoGen
    5. Haystack Agents
    6. OpenAI Assistants API

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named uluckyXH/OpenMOSS. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of uluckyXH/OpenMOSS?
    pass
    AI named uluckyXH/OpenMOSS explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts uluckyXH/OpenMOSS in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named uluckyXH/OpenMOSS explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo uluckyXH/OpenMOSS solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named uluckyXH/OpenMOSS explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of uluckyXH/OpenMOSS. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/uluckyXH/OpenMOSS.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/uluckyXH/OpenMOSS)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/uluckyXH/OpenMOSS"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/uluckyXH/OpenMOSS.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

uluckyXH/OpenMOSS — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite