RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

wm94i/Work-Review

Default branch main · commit 52981c50 · scanned 6/29/2026, 3:21:45 AM

GitHub: 1,434 stars · 85 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface wm94i/Work-Review, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 description to emphasize personal activity tracking

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A local-first personal work review tool that records context, helps you review your day, and generates daily reports.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A local-first personal activity tracker and work review tool that records your computer usage, helps you review your day, and generates daily reports.
  • highabout#2
    Clarify the repository's 'about' description to explicitly state its purpose and what it is not

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Automatically tracks which apps you used, which websites you visited, and how much time you spent in each app throughout the day.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A local-first personal activity tracker that automatically records your computer usage, apps, websites, and time spent, helping you review your day and generate reports. It is designed for personal productivity and recall, not for team monitoring or submission review.
  • mediumtopics#3
    Refine and expand repository topics for better category visibility

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai, daily-report, dashboard, privacy, productivity, time-tracking, timetracker, timetracking, work-log
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai, daily-report, dashboard, privacy, productivity, time-tracking, work-log, activity-tracker, desktop-activity

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface wm94i/Work-Review
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
RescueTime
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. RescueTime · recommended 2×
  2. ManicTime · recommended 2×
  3. Toggl Track · recommended 2×
  4. Cold Turkey Blocker · recommended 1×
  5. ActivityWatch · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automatically track my daily computer usage and application time for productivity?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. RescueTime
    2. ManicTime
    3. Cold Turkey Blocker
    4. ActivityWatch
    5. Toggl Track
    6. Hubstaff

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named wm94i/Work-Review. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a private desktop activity tracker that generates daily work reports locally.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. RescueTime
    2. ManicTime
    3. ActivityWatch (ActivityWatch/activitywatch)
    4. Timeular
    5. Toggl Track
    6. DeskTime

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named wm94i/Work-Review. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of wm94i/Work-Review?
    pass
    AI named wm94i/Work-Review explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts wm94i/Work-Review in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named wm94i/Work-Review explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo wm94i/Work-Review solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named wm94i/Work-Review explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of wm94i/Work-Review. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/wm94i/Work-Review.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/wm94i/Work-Review)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/wm94i/Work-Review"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/wm94i/Work-Review.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

wm94i/Work-Review — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite