RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

wm94i/Work-Review

Default branch main · commit 28074f42 · scanned 5/17/2026, 10:01:50 PM

GitHub: 1,201 stars · 70 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface wm94i/Work-Review, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highlicense#1
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a `LICENSE` file to your repository root, containing the full text of the MIT License.
  • highabout#2
    Update the repository description to highlight unique positioning

    Why:

    CURRENT
    帮你自动记录一天中使用了哪些应用、浏览了哪些网页、在每个应用上花了多少时间
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    面向个人的、本地优先的工作记录与复盘工具，自动整理应用、网站、窗口记录，并利用AI生成可回看、可追问的工作时间线。
  • mediumtopics#3
    Add more specific topics to improve query matching

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai, daily-report, privacy, productivity, time-tracking, work-log
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai, daily-report, privacy, productivity, time-tracking, work-log, local-first, desktop-app, personal-productivity, work-review

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface wm94i/Work-Review
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
RescueTime
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. RescueTime · recommended 2×
  2. ManicTime · recommended 2×
  3. Toggl Track · recommended 2×
  4. Clockify · recommended 2×
  5. ActivityWatch · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automatically log my daily computer activities for personal productivity reports?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. RescueTime
    2. ManicTime
    3. ActivityWatch
    4. Toggl Track
    5. Clockify
    6. Smarter Time

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named wm94i/Work-Review. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a local-first time tracking tool with AI to summarize my workday activities.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Clockify
    2. Toggl Track
    3. RescueTime
    4. ActivityWatch (ActivityWatch/activitywatch)
    5. ManicTime

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named wm94i/Work-Review. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of wm94i/Work-Review?
    pass
    AI did not name wm94i/Work-Review — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts wm94i/Work-Review in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named wm94i/Work-Review explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo wm94i/Work-Review solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named wm94i/Work-Review explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of wm94i/Work-Review. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/wm94i/Work-Review.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/wm94i/Work-Review)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/wm94i/Work-Review"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/wm94i/Work-Review.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

wm94i/Work-Review — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite