RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

hadriansecurity/OpenHack

Default branch main · commit e43e4cb2 · scanned 6/10/2026, 11:13:20 PM

GitHub: 649 stars · 94 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface hadriansecurity/OpenHack, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Emphasize AI agent orchestration and whitebox security review in README's opening

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A lightweight, file-based workspace for source-guided whitebox security review.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Hadrian OpenHack is a lightweight, file-based workspace designed for **AI agent-driven, source-guided whitebox security review**. It orchestrates generative AI models (like Claude Code, Codex, or Cursor) to automate vulnerability research, manage durable workflow state, and streamline the human-in-the-loop approval process for security findings.
  • hightopics#2
    Add specific topics for AI agents, whitebox review, and vulnerability research

    Why:

    CURRENT
    cybersecurity, hacking, security
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    cybersecurity, hacking, security, ai-agents, whitebox-security-review, vulnerability-research, source-code-analysis, llm-security, generative-ai
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://hadriansecurity.com/openhack

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface hadriansecurity/OpenHack
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GitHub Advanced Security
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GitHub Advanced Security · recommended 1×
  2. CodeQL · recommended 1×
  3. GitHub Copilot for Security · recommended 1×
  4. Dependabot · recommended 1×
  5. Semgrep · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to automate whitebox security reviews for source code using AI agents?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Advanced Security
    2. CodeQL
    3. GitHub Copilot for Security
    4. Dependabot
    5. Semgrep
    6. Semgrep AppSec Platform
    7. Snyk Code
    8. Checkmarx SAST
    9. SonarQube
    10. SonarCloud
    11. SonarLint
    12. OpenAI GPT-4
    13. Claude
    14. Llama 2
    15. LangChain
    16. AutoGen
    17. DeepCode AI

    AI recommended 17 alternatives but never named hadriansecurity/OpenHack. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tool for managing security review findings and workflow state in a file-based system?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. DefectDojo (DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo)
    2. Jira
    3. GitHub Issues
    4. GitLab Issues
    5. OWASP Glue (OWASP/glue)
    6. Vuls (future-architect/vuls)
    7. Trello

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named hadriansecurity/OpenHack. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of hadriansecurity/OpenHack?
    pass
    AI named hadriansecurity/OpenHack explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts hadriansecurity/OpenHack in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named hadriansecurity/OpenHack explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo hadriansecurity/OpenHack solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named hadriansecurity/OpenHack explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of hadriansecurity/OpenHack. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/hadriansecurity/OpenHack.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/hadriansecurity/OpenHack)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/hadriansecurity/OpenHack"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/hadriansecurity/OpenHack.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

hadriansecurity/OpenHack — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite