RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

raizamartin/gemini-code

Default branch main · commit 6da9a30c · scanned 6/10/2026, 8:11:50 PM

GitHub: 547 stars · 84 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
17 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface raizamartin/gemini-code, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highlicense#1
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root with the text of a suitable open-source license, such as the MIT License. You can find templates on sites like choosealicense.com.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Set the repository homepage URL

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://pypi.org/project/gemini-code/

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface raizamartin/gemini-code
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Cursor
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Cursor · recommended 1×
  2. Continue · recommended 1×
  3. Shell Genie · recommended 1×
  4. smol-ai/shell · recommended 1×
  5. GitHub Copilot · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I get an interactive AI coding assistant directly in my terminal?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Cursor
    2. Continue
    3. Shell Genie
    4. smol-ai/shell (smol-ai/shell)
    5. GitHub Copilot

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named raizamartin/gemini-code. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a command-line AI assistant that can help with code, linting, and tests.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot CLI
    2. Continue.dev (CLI)
    3. OpenAI CLI
    4. Cursor (CLI)
    5. aider
    6. CodeGPT (CLI)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named raizamartin/gemini-code. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of raizamartin/gemini-code?
    pass
    AI did not name raizamartin/gemini-code — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts raizamartin/gemini-code in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named raizamartin/gemini-code explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo raizamartin/gemini-code solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name raizamartin/gemini-code — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of raizamartin/gemini-code. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/raizamartin/gemini-code.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/raizamartin/gemini-code)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/raizamartin/gemini-code"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/raizamartin/gemini-code.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

raizamartin/gemini-code — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
raizamartin/gemini-code — RepoGEO report