RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

marcelscruz/dev-resources

Default branch main · commit d3d450e9 · scanned 6/24/2026, 10:02:47 AM

GitHub: 1,302 stars · 744 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface marcelscruz/dev-resources, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's core purpose statement

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The README currently opens with sponsorship information.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Move the core purpose statement to the very top of the README, before any sponsorship or navigation links. For example: "# Dev Resources: A Collaborative List of Resources for Developers"
  • mediumreadme#2
    Expand on the types of resources covered in the README introduction

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The README's initial description is general ("A collaborative list of resources for developers").
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a sentence or short bulleted list near the top of the README, explicitly listing the categories of resources, e.g., "This comprehensive collection includes learning materials, development tools, public APIs, design guides, infrastructure tips, and career resources."
  • lowcomparison#3
    Add a 'Why Dev Resources?' section to the README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The README does not explicitly state its unique approach or differentiate itself from other resource lists.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a section titled "Why Dev Resources?" or "What makes this list unique?" in the README, explaining its focus on being a curated, collaborative, and opinionated collection of practical development resources.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface marcelscruz/dev-resources
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
freeCodeCamp
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. freeCodeCamp · recommended 1×
  2. GitHub Awesome Lists · recommended 1×
  3. Dev.to · recommended 1×
  4. Stack Overflow · recommended 1×
  5. Medium · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find a comprehensive list of resources for general software development?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. freeCodeCamp
    2. GitHub Awesome Lists
    3. Dev.to
    4. Stack Overflow
    5. Medium
    6. O'Reilly Media
    7. Coursera
    8. edX

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named marcelscruz/dev-resources. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are good curated lists of public APIs and tools for my projects?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Awesome APIs
    2. Public APIs (toddmotto/public-apis)
    3. API List
    4. RapidAPI Hub
    5. ProgrammableWeb
    6. AnyAPI

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named marcelscruz/dev-resources. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of marcelscruz/dev-resources?
    pass
    AI named marcelscruz/dev-resources explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts marcelscruz/dev-resources in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named marcelscruz/dev-resources explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo marcelscruz/dev-resources solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name marcelscruz/dev-resources — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of marcelscruz/dev-resources. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/marcelscruz/dev-resources.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/marcelscruz/dev-resources)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/marcelscruz/dev-resources"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/marcelscruz/dev-resources.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

marcelscruz/dev-resources — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite