REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

kam800/MachObfuscator

Default branch master · commit 3b0e899a · scanned 6/13/2026, 2:52:46 PM

GitHub: 546 stars · 80 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE

28 /100

Critical

Category recall

0 / 2

Not recommended in any query

Rule findings

1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail

Objective metadata checks

AI knows your name

2 / 3

Direct prompts that named your repo

HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface kam800/MachObfuscator, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION

hightopics#1

Add relevant topics for discoverability

Why:

COPY-PASTE FIX

mach-o, obfuscator, ios, macos, apple-platforms, reverse-engineering, security, binary-obfuscation, symbol-obfuscation

highreadme#2

Clarify the unique value proposition in the README's opening

Why:

CURRENT

# MachObfuscator 🔏

> ❗️❗️❗️
>
> MachObfuscator does not currently support binaries with minimum Deployment Target >= 12.X,
>
> MachObfuscator does not currently run on macOS Deployment Target >= 12.X.

MachObfuscator is a programming-language-agnostic Mach-O apps obfuscator (for Apple platforms).

COPY-PASTE FIX

# MachObfuscator 🔏

MachObfuscator is a **post-compilation, programming-language-agnostic Mach-O binary obfuscator** for Apple platforms. It specifically focuses on **symbolic obfuscation** to make reverse engineering iOS and macOS applications significantly harder, without requiring access to source code.

> ❗️❗️❗️
> MachObfuscator does not currently support binaries with minimum Deployment Target >= 12.X,
> MachObfuscator does not currently run on macOS Deployment Target >= 12.X.

mediumhomepage#3
Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata
Why:
COPY-PASTE FIX
```
https://github.com/kam800/MachObfuscator
```

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall

0 / 2

0% of queries surface kam800/MachObfuscator

Avg rank

—

Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.

Share of voice

Of all named tools, what % are you?

Top rival

obfuscator-llvm/obfuscator

Recommended in 1 of 2 queries

COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD

obfuscator-llvm/obfuscator · recommended 1×
Arxan · recommended 1×
iXGuard · recommended 1×
MetaGuard · recommended 1×
Server-Side Logic · recommended 1×

CATEGORY QUERY
How to protect my compiled iOS application binaries from reverse engineering?
you: not recommended
AI recommended (in order):
1. Obfuscator-LLVM (obfuscator-llvm/obfuscator)
2. Arxan
3. iXGuard
4. MetaGuard
5. Server-Side Logic
AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named kam800/MachObfuscator. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
CATEGORY QUERY
Tool to obfuscate symbol names in Mach-O executables for Apple apps?
you: not recommended
AI recommended (in order):
1. Obfuscator-LLVM (O-LLVM)
2. SwiftShield
3. Arxan Application Protection
4. Guardsquare DexGuard/iXGuard
AI recommended 4 alternatives but never named kam800/MachObfuscator. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

Metadata completeness
warn
Suggestion:
README presence
pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of kam800/MachObfuscator?
pass
AI did not name kam800/MachObfuscator — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
If a team adopts kam800/MachObfuscator in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
pass
AI named kam800/MachObfuscator explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
In one sentence, what problem does the repo kam800/MachObfuscator solve, and who is the primary audience?
pass
AI named kam800/MachObfuscator explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of kam800/MachObfuscator. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

Live preview

MARKDOWN (README)

[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/kam800/MachObfuscator.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/kam800/MachObfuscator)

HTML

<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/kam800/MachObfuscator"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/kam800/MachObfuscator.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>

Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

kam800/MachObfuscator — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

Deep reports10 / month
Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite