RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

router-for-me/Cli-Proxy-API-Management-Center

Default branch main · commit 62092cc8 · scanned 5/10/2026, 11:56:44 PM

GitHub: 2,563 stars · 823 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface router-for-me/Cli-Proxy-API-Management-Center, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1 to emphasize 'Web UI' and 'Management'

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # CLI Proxy API Management Center
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # CLI Proxy API Management Center: Web UI for CLI Proxy API Configuration and Monitoring
  • hightopics#2
    Add descriptive topics for better categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    web-ui, api-management, proxy, configuration, monitoring, react, typescript
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repo metadata

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://remote.router-for.me/

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface router-for-me/Cli-Proxy-API-Management-Center
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Prometheus
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Prometheus · recommended 1×
  2. Grafana · recommended 1×
  3. Consul · recommended 1×
  4. Netdata · recommended 1×
  5. ZooKeeper · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to easily manage configuration and monitor status for a command-line proxy service?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Prometheus
    2. Grafana
    3. Consul
    4. Netdata
    5. ZooKeeper
    6. etcd
    7. Supervisor
    8. systemd
    9. Ansible
    10. Puppet
    11. Chef
    12. Nagios
    13. Zabbix

    AI recommended 13 alternatives but never named router-for-me/Cli-Proxy-API-Management-Center. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a web interface to troubleshoot and operate a proxy API's management functions.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Swagger UI / OpenAPI Generator (swagger-api/swagger-ui)
    2. Postman
    3. Insomnia (Kong/insomnia)
    4. Kong Manager (Kong/kong)
    5. Apigee Edge UI
    6. AWS API Gateway Console
    7. Azure API Management Portal

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named router-for-me/Cli-Proxy-API-Management-Center. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of router-for-me/Cli-Proxy-API-Management-Center?
    pass
    AI did not name router-for-me/Cli-Proxy-API-Management-Center — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts router-for-me/Cli-Proxy-API-Management-Center in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named router-for-me/Cli-Proxy-API-Management-Center explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo router-for-me/Cli-Proxy-API-Management-Center solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named router-for-me/Cli-Proxy-API-Management-Center explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of router-for-me/Cli-Proxy-API-Management-Center. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/router-for-me/Cli-Proxy-API-Management-Center.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/router-for-me/Cli-Proxy-API-Management-Center)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/router-for-me/Cli-Proxy-API-Management-Center"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/router-for-me/Cli-Proxy-API-Management-Center.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

router-for-me/Cli-Proxy-API-Management-Center — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite