RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

AdnaneKhan/gato-x

Default branch main · commit d5934667 · scanned 6/5/2026, 7:26:25 AM

GitHub: 541 stars · 50 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface AdnaneKhan/gato-x, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 to clearly state the repo's purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Gato (Github Attack TOolkit) - Extreme Edition
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Gato-X: GitHub Actions Security & Attack Toolkit
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add a dedicated section or prominent statement on Gato-X's unique differentiators

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section titled 'Why Gato-X?' or integrate a clear statement early in the README, emphasizing that Gato-X 'surfaces vulnerabilities that other scanners miss because they only scan workflows within a single repository' and is 'tuned to avoid false negatives' for specific GitHub Actions attack vectors.
  • lowtopics#3
    Expand repository topics with more specific security terms

    Why:

    CURRENT
    bugbounty, cicd, github, github-actions, hacking, red-team
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    bugbounty, cicd, github, github-actions, hacking, red-team, github-actions-security, workflow-security, supply-chain-security, static-analysis-security

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface AdnaneKhan/gato-x
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
aquasecurity/trivy
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. aquasecurity/trivy · recommended 2×
  2. GitHub Advanced Security (GHAS) - Code scanning with CodeQL · recommended 1×
  3. returntocorp/semgrep · recommended 1×
  4. rhysd/actionlint · recommended 1×
  5. bridgecrewio/checkov · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to scan GitHub Actions workflows for common security vulnerabilities and misconfigurations?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Advanced Security (GHAS) - Code scanning with CodeQL
    2. Semgrep (returntocorp/semgrep)
    3. Actionlint (rhysd/actionlint)
    4. Trivy (aquasecurity/trivy)
    5. Checkov (bridgecrewio/checkov)
    6. GitHub's built-in Dependabot

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named AdnaneKhan/gato-x. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are effective tools for red teaming and bug bounty hunting in CI/CD pipelines?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Snyk Code
    2. Semgrep (r2c/semgrep)
    3. Checkmarx SAST
    4. Dependabot
    5. OWASP Dependency-Check (jeremylong/DependencyCheck)
    6. OWASP ZAP (zaproxy/zaproxy)
    7. Postman
    8. Newman (postmanlabs/newman)
    9. Trivy (aquasecurity/trivy)

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named AdnaneKhan/gato-x. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of AdnaneKhan/gato-x?
    pass
    AI named AdnaneKhan/gato-x explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts AdnaneKhan/gato-x in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named AdnaneKhan/gato-x explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo AdnaneKhan/gato-x solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named AdnaneKhan/gato-x explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of AdnaneKhan/gato-x. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/AdnaneKhan/gato-x.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/AdnaneKhan/gato-x)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/AdnaneKhan/gato-x"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/AdnaneKhan/gato-x.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

AdnaneKhan/gato-x — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite