RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

QJHWC/PaperForge

Default branch main · commit fa20e0ff · scanned 6/11/2026, 2:23:14 PM

GitHub: 570 stars · 89 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface QJHWC/PaperForge, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add an English-first introduction to the README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # PaperForge

面向研究论文生成、实验驱动写作、现有成稿精修与模板迁移的自动化工作台。
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # PaperForge

End-to-end AI-powered academic paper writing system — from idea generation and literature search to experiment execution, result backfill, and LaTeX paper compilation. Supports multi-LLM routing, SSH remote training, incremental sync, and anti-AI-detection writing style.

面向研究论文生成、实验驱动写作、现有成稿精修与模板迁移的自动化工作台。
  • mediumlicense#2
    Clarify the project's license in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## License

This project is licensed under a custom license. Please refer to the `LICENSE` file in the repository for full details on usage and distribution.
  • lowhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://[your-project-homepage-url-here]

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface QJHWC/PaperForge
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ChatGPT
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ChatGPT · recommended 2×
  2. Semantic Scholar · recommended 2×
  3. Overleaf · recommended 2×
  4. Elicit · recommended 1×
  5. Connected Papers · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can AI automate the entire academic paper writing process, from research to LaTeX compilation?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Elicit
    2. ChatGPT
    3. Semantic Scholar
    4. Connected Papers
    5. Grammarly
    6. Overleaf
    7. Scite.ai

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named QJHWC/PaperForge. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What AI tools assist with scientific paper generation, including experiment results and LaTeX formatting?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Overleaf
    2. ChatGPT
    3. GPT-4
    4. ChatGPT for Google Docs, Sheets & Slides
    5. Authorea
    6. SciSpace
    7. Semantic Scholar
    8. Trinka AI
    9. DeepL Write

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named QJHWC/PaperForge. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of QJHWC/PaperForge?
    pass
    AI named QJHWC/PaperForge explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts QJHWC/PaperForge in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named QJHWC/PaperForge explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo QJHWC/PaperForge solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named QJHWC/PaperForge explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of QJHWC/PaperForge. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/QJHWC/PaperForge.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/QJHWC/PaperForge)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/QJHWC/PaperForge"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/QJHWC/PaperForge.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

QJHWC/PaperForge — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite