RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

NeoVertex1/SuperPrompt

Default branch main · commit b12f53bb · scanned 6/24/2026, 8:03:12 PM

GitHub: 6,423 stars · 573 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface NeoVertex1/SuperPrompt, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening to clearly define SuperPrompt as an LLM prompt engineering framework

    Why:

    CURRENT
    This is a project that I decided to open source because I think it might help others understand AI agents. This prompt took me many months and is still in phase of forever beta. You will want to use this prompt with Claude (as custom instructions in the project knowledge) but it also work with other llms.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    SuperPrompt is a structured prompt engineering framework designed to guide Large Language Models (LLMs), particularly Claude, to generate novel, 'outside-the-box' ideas and enable complex agent behaviors. It uses a templated approach with notations and XML tags to turn logical statements into actionable LLM agents, helping users explore deeper areas of model thought.
  • highlicense#2
    Add a standard open-source license file to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root containing the text of your chosen open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, GPL-3.0).
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository's 'About' section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add `https://github.com/NeoVertex1/SuperPrompt` as the homepage URL in the repository settings, or link to a dedicated project documentation site if one exists.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface NeoVertex1/SuperPrompt
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
TRIZ
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. TRIZ · recommended 1×
  2. SCAMPER · recommended 1×
  3. futuristic scenario planning · recommended 1×
  4. speculative design · recommended 1×
  5. design thinking · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to engineer prompts that make large language models generate novel, out-of-the-box ideas?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. TRIZ
    2. SCAMPER
    3. futuristic scenario planning
    4. speculative design
    5. design thinking

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named NeoVertex1/SuperPrompt. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a framework or method for structuring complex prompts to guide LLM agent behavior.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain Expression Language (LCEL)
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. DSPy
    4. Guidance
    5. Autogen

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named NeoVertex1/SuperPrompt. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of NeoVertex1/SuperPrompt?
    pass
    AI named NeoVertex1/SuperPrompt explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts NeoVertex1/SuperPrompt in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named NeoVertex1/SuperPrompt explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo NeoVertex1/SuperPrompt solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named NeoVertex1/SuperPrompt explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of NeoVertex1/SuperPrompt. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/NeoVertex1/SuperPrompt.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/NeoVertex1/SuperPrompt)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/NeoVertex1/SuperPrompt"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/NeoVertex1/SuperPrompt.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

NeoVertex1/SuperPrompt — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite