RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

standardagents/dmux

Default branch main · commit 67cd2b6e · scanned 6/25/2026, 3:19:43 AM

GitHub: 1,667 stars · 131 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface standardagents/dmux, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening paragraph to clarify its interactive, local developer tool nature

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <p align="center"> Manage multiple AI coding agents in isolated git worktrees.<br/> Branch, develop, and merge &mdash; all in parallel.</p>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <p align="center"> An interactive CLI for local AI agent development, enabling parallel work with coding agents in isolated git worktrees.<br/> Branch, develop, and merge &mdash; all in parallel.</p>
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add 'developer-tool' and 'local-development' to repository topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agentic-workflow, ai, ai-agents, cli, coding-agents, coordinator, orchestration
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agentic-workflow, ai, ai-agents, cli, coding-agents, coordinator, orchestration, developer-tool, local-development
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a 'Comparison' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Comparison
    
    dmux is an interactive CLI for local AI agent development, not a CI/CD pipeline (like GitHub Actions or Jenkins), a backend message queue (like RabbitMQ or Kafka), or a general-purpose agent framework (like LangChain). It focuses on providing isolated, parallel development environments for coding agents directly on your machine.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface standardagents/dmux
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GitHub Actions
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GitHub Actions · recommended 2×
  2. LangChain · recommended 1×
  3. RabbitMQ · recommended 1×
  4. Apache Kafka · recommended 1×
  5. PostgreSQL · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to manage multiple AI coding agents working on separate features simultaneously?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. RabbitMQ
    3. Apache Kafka
    4. PostgreSQL
    5. MongoDB
    6. AutoGPT
    7. GitHub Copilot Workspace
    8. OpenAI API
    9. Anthropic Claude
    10. Google Gemini
    11. Git
    12. CrewAI
    13. Smol-developer
    14. Azure DevOps
    15. GitHub Actions

    AI recommended 15 alternatives but never named standardagents/dmux. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tool to orchestrate AI development agents across isolated git branches or worktrees?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Actions
    2. GitLab CI/CD
    3. Jenkins (jenkinsci/jenkins)
    4. Argo Workflows (argoproj/argo-workflows)
    5. Apache Airflow (apache/airflow)
    6. Dagster (dagster-io/dagster)
    7. Prefect (PrefectHQ/prefect)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named standardagents/dmux. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of standardagents/dmux?
    pass
    AI named standardagents/dmux explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts standardagents/dmux in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named standardagents/dmux explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo standardagents/dmux solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named standardagents/dmux explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of standardagents/dmux. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/standardagents/dmux.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/standardagents/dmux)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/standardagents/dmux"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/standardagents/dmux.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

standardagents/dmux — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite