RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper

Default branch main · commit 6baece9f · scanned 5/30/2026, 5:07:54 AM

GitHub: 601 stars · 42 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README's main tagline to clarify plugin and agent nature

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A research harness for Claude Code — turn your terminal into an autonomous research lab.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A Claude Code plugin that turns your terminal into an autonomous research lab — literature survey, experiment execution, paper writing, all in one pipeline.
  • hightopics#2
    Add specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    claude-code, plugin, ai-agent, research-automation, llm-agent, scientific-research, terminal-tool, paper-writing
  • mediumcomparison#3
    Add a comparison section to differentiate from generic LLMs and research tools

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## How Oh My Paper Compares

Compared to generic LLMs like GPT-4 or Claude 3 Opus, Oh My Paper is a specialized plugin for Claude Code, providing a pre-configured autonomous agent team and a full research pipeline (survey, experiment, writing) directly within your terminal. Unlike general research tools such as Elicit or Semantic Scholar, Oh My Paper actively executes experiments and drafts papers, rather than just assisting with literature discovery.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Elicit
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Elicit · recommended 2×
  2. GPT-4 · recommended 2×
  3. Semantic Scholar · recommended 1×
  4. Connected Papers · recommended 1×
  5. ResearchRabbit · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automate the entire research pipeline, from literature review to experiment execution and paper writing?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Semantic Scholar
    2. Connected Papers
    3. ResearchRabbit
    4. Elicit
    5. Zotero
    6. Mendeley
    7. OpenAI Gym
    8. Stable Baselines3
    9. PyTorch
    10. TensorFlow
    11. LabVIEW
    12. Jupyter Notebooks
    13. Google Colab
    14. Python
    15. Pandas
    16. NumPy
    17. SciPy
    18. Matplotlib
    19. Seaborn
    20. R
    21. Tidyverse
    22. dplyr
    23. ggplot2
    24. Tableau
    25. Power BI
    26. LaTeX
    27. Overleaf
    28. Pandoc
    29. Grammarly
    30. LanguageTool
    31. ChatGPT
    32. GPT-4
    33. Git
    34. GitHub
    35. GitLab
    36. Docker
    37. Apache Airflow
    38. Prefect

    AI recommended 38 alternatives but never named LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking an AI agent to manage scientific research tasks and draft papers directly from the terminal.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GPT-4
    2. OpenAI API
    3. oai-cli
    4. shell-gpt
    5. Claude 3 Opus
    6. Anthropic API
    7. Llama 3
    8. Ollama
    9. Perplexity AI
    10. Elicit
    11. transformers
    12. langchain

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper?
    pass
    AI named LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite