RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

littlewwwhite/KnowledgeGraph-based-on-Raw-text-A27

Default branch main · commit c87c733b · scanned 6/6/2026, 6:48:01 AM

GitHub: 528 stars · 73 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
17 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface littlewwwhite/KnowledgeGraph-based-on-Raw-text-A27, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    knowledge-graph, llm, chatbot, q-a-system, nlp, information-extraction, chatglm, paddlepaddle, pytorch, vuejs
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    (Create a LICENSE file in the repository root with an appropriate open-source license, e.g., MIT or Apache-2.0, to clarify usage terms.)
  • mediumreadme#3
    Clarify the system's end-to-end nature in the README's opening

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Combining Knowledge Graph Construction, Graph Completion, and ChatGLM for Intelligent Q&A
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ChatKG is a comprehensive, end-to-end system for building intelligent Q&A solutions, combining knowledge graph construction, graph completion, and large language models like ChatGLM for advanced conversational AI.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface littlewwwhite/KnowledgeGraph-based-on-Raw-text-A27
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Prodigy
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Prodigy · recommended 2×
  2. neo4j/neo4j · recommended 1×
  3. vaticle/typedb · recommended 1×
  4. Amazon Neptune · recommended 1×
  5. explosion/spaCy · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to build an intelligent Q&A system using knowledge graphs and large language models?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Neo4j (neo4j/neo4j)
    2. TypeDB (vaticle/typedb)
    3. Amazon Neptune
    4. SpaCy (explosion/spaCy)
    5. OpenIE
    6. Stanford CoreNLP (stanfordnlp/CoreNLP)
    7. Prodigy
    8. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    9. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    10. Hugging Face Transformers (huggingface/transformers)
    11. OpenAI API
    12. Azure OpenAI Service
    13. Anthropic Claude API
    14. Google Gemini API
    15. Cypher
    16. Gremlin
    17. TypeQL
    18. SPARQL
    19. Pydantic (pydantic/pydantic)

    AI recommended 19 alternatives but never named littlewwwhite/KnowledgeGraph-based-on-Raw-text-A27. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help extract knowledge from raw text for a knowledge graph-powered LLM chatbot?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. spaCy
    2. OpenNRE
    3. Stanza
    4. GraphDB
    5. Neo4j
    6. Haystack
    7. Prodigy

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named littlewwwhite/KnowledgeGraph-based-on-Raw-text-A27. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of littlewwwhite/KnowledgeGraph-based-on-Raw-text-A27?
    pass
    AI did not name littlewwwhite/KnowledgeGraph-based-on-Raw-text-A27 — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts littlewwwhite/KnowledgeGraph-based-on-Raw-text-A27 in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named littlewwwhite/KnowledgeGraph-based-on-Raw-text-A27 explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo littlewwwhite/KnowledgeGraph-based-on-Raw-text-A27 solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name littlewwwhite/KnowledgeGraph-based-on-Raw-text-A27 — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of littlewwwhite/KnowledgeGraph-based-on-Raw-text-A27. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/littlewwwhite/KnowledgeGraph-based-on-Raw-text-A27.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/littlewwwhite/KnowledgeGraph-based-on-Raw-text-A27)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/littlewwwhite/KnowledgeGraph-based-on-Raw-text-A27"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/littlewwwhite/KnowledgeGraph-based-on-Raw-text-A27.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

littlewwwhite/KnowledgeGraph-based-on-Raw-text-A27 — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite