RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

reaviz/reagraph

Default branch master · commit 0475f0c6 · scanned 5/15/2026, 3:33:30 PM

GitHub: 1,033 stars · 91 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface reaviz/reagraph, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Refine README's opening statement to emphasize Reagraph's unique value

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Reagraph is a high-performance network graph visualization built in WebGL for React.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Reagraph delivers unparalleled performance for interactive network graph visualizations in React, leveraging WebGL to handle large and complex datasets with ease.
  • mediumcomparison#2
    Add a dedicated section comparing Reagraph to alternatives

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section, for example, '## Why Reagraph? Unmatched Performance for Large Graphs' or '## Reagraph vs. Alternatives', explaining how Reagraph's WebGL foundation provides superior performance and scalability for large, complex graphs compared to traditional SVG/Canvas 2D solutions.
  • lowabout#3
    Enhance repository description to highlight high-performance

    Why:

    CURRENT
    🕸 WebGL Graph Visualizations for React. Maintained by @goodcodeus.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    🕸 High-performance WebGL Graph Visualizations for React. Maintained by @goodcodeus.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface reaviz/reagraph
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
React Flow
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. React Flow · recommended 1×
  2. Vis.js · recommended 1×
  3. D3.js · recommended 1×
  4. Cytoscape.js · recommended 1×
  5. Graphin · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What's the best way to render performant network graph visualizations within a React app?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. React Flow
    2. Vis.js
    3. D3.js
    4. Cytoscape.js
    5. Graphin

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named reaviz/reagraph. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I display interactive, high-performance knowledge graphs using WebGL in a React project?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Cytoscape.js (cytoscape/cytoscape.js)
    2. Cytoscape.js-webgl-renderer (cytoscape/cytoscape.js-webgl-renderer)
    3. Cytoscape.js-canvas-renderer (cytoscape/cytoscape.js-canvas-renderer)
    4. react-force-graph (vasturiano/react-force-graph)

    AI recommended 4 alternatives but never named reaviz/reagraph. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of reaviz/reagraph?
    pass
    AI did not name reaviz/reagraph — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts reaviz/reagraph in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named reaviz/reagraph explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo reaviz/reagraph solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named reaviz/reagraph explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of reaviz/reagraph. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/reaviz/reagraph.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/reaviz/reagraph)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/reaviz/reagraph"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/reaviz/reagraph.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

reaviz/reagraph — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite