RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

alchaincyf/obsidian-ai-orange-book

Default branch master · commit f6599348 · scanned 6/1/2026, 4:08:10 PM

GitHub: 1,011 stars · 99 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
17 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface alchaincyf/obsidian-ai-orange-book, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    obsidian, claude, ai, pkm, knowledge-management, second-brain, guide, methodology, llm, markdown
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the root of the repository with a standard open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, GPL-3.0) that aligns with the project's goals.
  • mediumabout#3
    Clarify the repository description to emphasize it's a guide

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Obsidian + Claude Code: Rebuild Your Second Brain with AI · 橙皮书系列 · 用AI重建你的第二大脑
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A comprehensive guide (橙皮书系列) to rebuilding your second brain with AI using Obsidian + Claude Code. Learn AI-powered knowledge management methodology.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface alchaincyf/obsidian-ai-orange-book
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Obsidian
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Obsidian · recommended 2×
  2. Smart Connections · recommended 2×
  3. Text Generator · recommended 2×
  4. Dataview · recommended 2×
  5. Notion AI · recommended 2×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking methods to build an AI-powered personal knowledge management system for notes.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Obsidian
    2. Smart Connections
    3. Text Generator
    4. Dataview
    5. Notion AI
    6. Mem.ai
    7. Logseq
    8. Logseq GPT3 OpenAI Plugin
    9. Roam Research
    10. Evernote

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named alchaincyf/obsidian-ai-orange-book. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to leverage large language models to compile and evolve personal knowledge bases?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Obsidian
    2. Smart Connections
    3. Text Generator
    4. Linter
    5. Dataview
    6. Mem.ai
    7. Mem X
    8. Logseq
    9. Logseq GPT3 OpenAI Plugin
    10. Logseq SmartBlock GPT
    11. Notion AI
    12. LangChain
    13. LlamaIndex
    14. TiddlyWiki
    15. TiddlyAI
    16. Ollama
    17. LM Studio

    AI recommended 17 alternatives but never named alchaincyf/obsidian-ai-orange-book. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of alchaincyf/obsidian-ai-orange-book?
    pass
    AI did not name alchaincyf/obsidian-ai-orange-book — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts alchaincyf/obsidian-ai-orange-book in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named alchaincyf/obsidian-ai-orange-book explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo alchaincyf/obsidian-ai-orange-book solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name alchaincyf/obsidian-ai-orange-book — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of alchaincyf/obsidian-ai-orange-book. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/alchaincyf/obsidian-ai-orange-book.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/alchaincyf/obsidian-ai-orange-book)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/alchaincyf/obsidian-ai-orange-book"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/alchaincyf/obsidian-ai-orange-book.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

alchaincyf/obsidian-ai-orange-book — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite