RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

open-gsd/get-shit-done-redux

Default branch next · commit 1067a0f3 · scanned 5/28/2026, 2:11:59 AM

GitHub: 1,348 stars · 77 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
27 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface open-gsd/get-shit-done-redux, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 to specify category

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # GET SHIT DONE
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # GET SHIT DONE: Meta-Prompting & Context Engineering for AI Code Generation
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add explicit 'boilerplate' clarification to README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This repository provides a boilerplate system, not a library or framework to be installed as a dependency.
  • lowabout#3
    Update the repository description

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Getting Shit Done, the Aftermath
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A meta-prompting and context engineering boilerplate for AI code generation, solving context rot in tools like Claude Code and Copilot.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface open-gsd/get-shit-done-redux
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 2×
  2. LlamaIndex · recommended 2×
  3. Semantic Kernel · recommended 1×
  4. GitHub Copilot · recommended 1×
  5. MLflow · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I manage context and prevent rot in large-scale AI code generation projects?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. Semantic Kernel
    4. GitHub Copilot
    5. MLflow
    6. DVC
    7. Jinja2
    8. Handlebars

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named open-gsd/get-shit-done-redux. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help with meta-prompting and spec-driven development for AI coding assistants?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. PromptLayer
    4. OpenAI API
    5. Anthropic
    6. Google
    7. Pydantic
    8. Guardrails AI
    9. Instructor

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named open-gsd/get-shit-done-redux. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of open-gsd/get-shit-done-redux?
    pass
    AI did not name open-gsd/get-shit-done-redux — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts open-gsd/get-shit-done-redux in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named open-gsd/get-shit-done-redux explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo open-gsd/get-shit-done-redux solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name open-gsd/get-shit-done-redux — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of open-gsd/get-shit-done-redux. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/open-gsd/get-shit-done-redux.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/open-gsd/get-shit-done-redux)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/open-gsd/get-shit-done-redux"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/open-gsd/get-shit-done-redux.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

open-gsd/get-shit-done-redux — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite