RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-money

Default branch main · commit c16df04d · scanned 6/28/2026, 12:17:35 AM

GitHub: 596 stars · 66 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
17 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-money, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1 to clarify purpose and mitigate name misinterpretation

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # cheat-on-money —— AI 时代靠谱兼职发现 + 反诈验证 skill
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # AI 时代靠谱兼职发现 + 反诈验证 skill (XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-money)
  • hightopics#2
    Add specific topics to improve AI categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    side-hustle, part-time-work, scam-detection, fraud-prevention, ai-assistant, generative-ai, career-guidance, job-search, personal-finance
  • mediumlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file to clarify usage terms

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root, e.g., using the MIT License template, to clearly state the terms of use and distribution.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-money
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
FlexJobs
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. FlexJobs · recommended 2×
  2. Upwork · recommended 2×
  3. Fiverr · recommended 2×
  4. Indeed · recommended 2×
  5. LinkedIn Jobs · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I find trustworthy online side hustles and avoid common scams?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. FlexJobs
    2. Upwork
    3. Fiverr
    4. Indeed
    5. LinkedIn Jobs
    6. SolidGigs
    7. Google
    8. Better Business Bureau (BBB)
    9. Reddit

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-money. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help verify part-time work opportunities and provide personalized income suggestions?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Indeed
    2. LinkedIn
    3. FlexJobs
    4. Glassdoor
    5. Upwork
    6. Fiverr
    7. Payscale
    8. Mint
    9. Personal Capital

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-money. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-money?
    pass
    AI did not name XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-money — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-money in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-money explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-money solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-money — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-money. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-money.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-money)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-money"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-money.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-money — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite