RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

fivetaku/fablize

Default branch main · commit d3384604 · scanned 6/21/2026, 11:36:58 AM

GitHub: 553 stars · 78 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface fivetaku/fablize, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Refine the repository description for clearer AI categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A Claude Code plugin that makes Opus behave like Fable — completion, evidence, and verification enforced as procedure. Ships only what a Fable-vs-Opus comparison proved transferable.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    An AI agent plugin for Claude Code that enforces Fable-like procedural rigor: completion, evidence, and verification. Improves Opus's consistency by applying verified procedures from a Fable-vs-Opus comparison.
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root, containing the text of the MIT License (as suggested by the README's mention of opensource.org/licenses/MIT).
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Set the repository's 'Homepage' URL to `https://github.com/fivetaku/fablize` or a dedicated project page if one exists.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface fivetaku/fablize
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 1×
  2. Auto-GPT · recommended 1×
  3. OpenAI Function Calling · recommended 1×
  4. Docker · recommended 1×
  5. Firecracker · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to make AI agents consistently provide evidence and verify their code solutions?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. Auto-GPT
    3. OpenAI Function Calling
    4. Docker
    5. Firecracker
    6. Pylint
    7. Flake8
    8. ESLint
    9. SonarQube
    10. pytest
    11. JUnit
    12. NUnit

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named fivetaku/fablize. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a tool to enforce rigorous procedural steps for AI agent code generation and validation.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. MLflow
    2. Apache Airflow
    3. Prefect
    4. Kubeflow Pipelines
    5. GitHub Actions
    6. GitLab CI/CD
    7. DVC
    8. Pydantic

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named fivetaku/fablize. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of fivetaku/fablize?
    pass
    AI named fivetaku/fablize explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts fivetaku/fablize in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named fivetaku/fablize explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo fivetaku/fablize solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named fivetaku/fablize explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of fivetaku/fablize. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/fivetaku/fablize.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/fivetaku/fablize)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/fivetaku/fablize"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/fivetaku/fablize.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

fivetaku/fablize — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite