RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

workweave/router

Default branch main · commit 4ab1c73b · scanned 7/1/2026, 2:53:27 PM

GitHub: 639 stars · 30 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface workweave/router, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a prominent, explicit statement about LLM model routing at the top of the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    workweave/router is an intelligent model router specifically designed for agentic systems, optimizing LLM prompt routing to reduce costs and improve performance by directing requests to the right model in under 50ms.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Expand topics with more specific LLM routing and AI gateway terms

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agentic-coding, ai-gateway, anthropic, claude-code, codex, model-router, openai-compatible
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agentic-coding, ai-gateway, anthropic, claude-code, codex, model-router, openai-compatible, llm-routing, ai-router, prompt-routing, llm-gateway, cost-optimization, agentic-ai
  • lowlicense#3
    Clarify the specific license(s) in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## License
This project is licensed under [Specify the actual license(s) here, e.g., 'a custom license combining X and Y', or 'the Z License']. Please refer to the LICENSE file for full details.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface workweave/router
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Portkey.ai
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Portkey.ai · recommended 2×
  2. GPT-4 · recommended 1×
  3. Claude 3 Opus · recommended 1×
  4. GPT-3.5 Turbo · recommended 1×
  5. Llama 2 · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to intelligently route LLM prompts to different models for cost savings?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GPT-4
    2. Claude 3 Opus
    3. GPT-3.5 Turbo
    4. Llama 2
    5. OpenAI
    6. Mistral Large
    7. Cohere Command R+
    8. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    9. Mistral 7B Instruct
    10. Claude 3 Sonnet
    11. Anyscale Endpoints
    12. Together AI
    13. Anthropic
    14. Google's Gemini Pro
    15. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    16. OpenRouter.ai
    17. LiteLLM (BerriAI/litellm)
    18. Portkey.ai
    19. Hugging Face Transformers (huggingface/transformers)
    20. DistilBERT
    21. RoBERTa-base
    22. Claude 3 Haiku

    AI recommended 22 alternatives but never named workweave/router. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Need an AI gateway to manage multiple LLM providers for agentic applications.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LiteLLM
    2. OpenRouter
    3. Portkey.ai
    4. Helicone
    5. BlindAI
    6. Azure AI Gateway
    7. LangChain

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named workweave/router. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of workweave/router?
    pass
    AI named workweave/router explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts workweave/router in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named workweave/router explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo workweave/router solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named workweave/router explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of workweave/router. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/workweave/router.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/workweave/router)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/workweave/router"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/workweave/router.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

workweave/router — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite