RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

OpenDCAI/DataFlow

Default branch main · commit 9932d311 · scanned 5/20/2026, 9:42:08 AM

GitHub: 3,799 stars · 390 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface OpenDCAI/DataFlow, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Refine the 'about' description to emphasize LLM-specific data preparation

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Easy Data Preparation with latest LLMs-based Operators and Pipelines.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Low-code, visual pipelines for generating, cleaning, and preparing high-quality datasets specifically for LLM training and fine-tuning.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Strengthen README's initial positioning statement

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # DataFlow
    
    **Generate, Clean, and Prepare LLM Data, All-in-One**
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # DataFlow
    
    **The low-code platform for generating, cleaning, and preparing high-quality datasets specifically for LLM training and fine-tuning.**
  • lowtopics#3
    Add more specific topics related to LLM training and dataset curation

    Why:

    CURRENT
    data, data-agent, data-cleaning, data-pipelines, data-processing, data-science, data-synthesis, gradio-interface, llms, operators, quick-data-processing, sglang-bankend, vllm-backend
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    data, data-agent, data-cleaning, data-pipelines, data-processing, data-science, data-synthesis, gradio-interface, llms, operators, quick-data-processing, sglang-bankend, vllm-backend, llm-training, llm-fine-tuning, dataset-curation

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface OpenDCAI/DataFlow
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
apache/spark
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. apache/spark · recommended 1×
  2. dask/dask · recommended 1×
  3. pandas-dev/pandas · recommended 1×
  4. huggingface/datasets · recommended 1×
  5. cleanlab/cleanlab · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to efficiently prepare and clean large datasets for training LLMs?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Apache Spark (apache/spark)
    2. Dask (dask/dask)
    3. Pandas (pandas-dev/pandas)
    4. Hugging Face Datasets (huggingface/datasets)
    5. Cleanlab (cleanlab/cleanlab)
    6. spaCy (explosion/spaCy)
    7. NLTK (nltk/nltk)
    8. Great Expectations (great-expectations/great_expectations)

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named OpenDCAI/DataFlow. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a low-code tool to build data pipelines for LLM-based applications.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    2. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    3. Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio (Designer)
    4. Google Cloud Vertex AI Workbench (Pipelines)
    5. Dataiku DSS (Data Science Studio)
    6. Knime Analytics Platform
    7. Zapier
    8. Make

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named OpenDCAI/DataFlow. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of OpenDCAI/DataFlow?
    pass
    AI named OpenDCAI/DataFlow explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts OpenDCAI/DataFlow in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named OpenDCAI/DataFlow explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo OpenDCAI/DataFlow solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named OpenDCAI/DataFlow explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of OpenDCAI/DataFlow. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/OpenDCAI/DataFlow.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/OpenDCAI/DataFlow)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/OpenDCAI/DataFlow"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/OpenDCAI/DataFlow.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

OpenDCAI/DataFlow — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite