RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

AmintaCCCP/GithubStarsManager

Default branch main · commit 4296dba1 · scanned 5/23/2026, 1:31:34 AM

GitHub: 2,697 stars · 127 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface AmintaCCCP/GithubStarsManager, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README opening to highlight AI features

    Why:

    CURRENT
    An app for managing github starred repositories.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    GithubStarsManager is an AI-powered desktop app that automatically syncs your starred GitHub repositories, uses AI to summarize and categorize them, and enables semantic search and release tracking.
  • hightopics#2
    Add specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    github-stars, star-manager, ai, semantic-search, release-tracking, desktop-app, electron-app, productivity, github-tool
  • mediumreadme#3
    Integrate 'Cross-device Sync' into main feature list

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new row to the 'Core Features' table: `| **Cross-device Sync** | Deploy an optional backend server for seamless synchronization across all your devices |`

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface AmintaCCCP/GithubStarsManager
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Starred
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Starred · recommended 2×
  2. Astro · recommended 1×
  3. StarSearch · recommended 1×
  4. GitHub's Native Starred Repositories Page · recommended 1×
  5. Pinning Repositories · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I better organize and search my growing list of GitHub starred repositories?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Astro
    2. StarSearch
    3. Starred
    4. GitHub's Native Starred Repositories Page
    5. Pinning Repositories
    6. Awesome List Repository

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named AmintaCCCP/GithubStarsManager. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools use AI to categorize and track releases for my GitHub stars?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Star History
    2. GitHunt
    3. Starred
    4. OctoRef
    5. GitHub API
    6. OpenAI API

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named AmintaCCCP/GithubStarsManager. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of AmintaCCCP/GithubStarsManager?
    pass
    AI named AmintaCCCP/GithubStarsManager explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts AmintaCCCP/GithubStarsManager in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named AmintaCCCP/GithubStarsManager explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo AmintaCCCP/GithubStarsManager solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named AmintaCCCP/GithubStarsManager explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of AmintaCCCP/GithubStarsManager. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/AmintaCCCP/GithubStarsManager.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/AmintaCCCP/GithubStarsManager)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/AmintaCCCP/GithubStarsManager"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/AmintaCCCP/GithubStarsManager.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

AmintaCCCP/GithubStarsManager — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite