RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

codefuse-ai/CodeFuse-muAgent

Default branch main · commit ebc8c3fb · scanned 6/12/2026, 1:01:56 AM

GitHub: 776 stars · 82 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface codefuse-ai/CodeFuse-muAgent, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reorder README to prioritize the Introduction

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The 'News' section appears before the 'Introduction' in the README's visible content.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Move the '🤝 Introduction' section to appear immediately after the main title, before the '🔔 News' section.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a relevant URL (e.g., a project website, documentation, or a dedicated landing page) to the repository's 'About' section.
  • lowlicense#3
    Clarify the existing license(s) in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a clear statement in the README (e.g., under a 'License' or 'Legal' section) specifying the exact license(s) that apply to the project.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface codefuse-ai/CodeFuse-muAgent
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
langchain-ai/langchain
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. langchain-ai/langchain · recommended 1×
  2. run-llama/llama_index · recommended 1×
  3. neo4j/neo4j · recommended 1×
  4. LangChain · recommended 1×
  5. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I build intelligent AI agents that leverage knowledge graphs for better reasoning and memory?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    2. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    3. Neo4j (neo4j/neo4j)

    AI recommended 3 alternatives but never named codefuse-ai/CodeFuse-muAgent. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are robust frameworks for orchestrating multiple AI agents, integrating RAG and tool learning?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. AutoGen
    4. Haystack
    5. CrewAI
    6. Marvin

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named codefuse-ai/CodeFuse-muAgent. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of codefuse-ai/CodeFuse-muAgent?
    pass
    AI named codefuse-ai/CodeFuse-muAgent explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts codefuse-ai/CodeFuse-muAgent in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named codefuse-ai/CodeFuse-muAgent explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo codefuse-ai/CodeFuse-muAgent solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named codefuse-ai/CodeFuse-muAgent explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of codefuse-ai/CodeFuse-muAgent. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/codefuse-ai/CodeFuse-muAgent.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/codefuse-ai/CodeFuse-muAgent)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/codefuse-ai/CodeFuse-muAgent"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/codefuse-ai/CodeFuse-muAgent.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

codefuse-ai/CodeFuse-muAgent — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite