RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

RobustNLP/CipherChat

Default branch main · commit 6fce7891 · scanned 6/10/2026, 3:33:37 PM

GitHub: 628 stars · 69 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface RobustNLP/CipherChat, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify README's opening sentence to emphasize unique LLM safety evaluation

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A novel framework CipherChat to systematically examine the generalizability of safety alignment to non-natural languages – ciphers.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    CipherChat is a novel evaluation framework designed to systematically test the generalization capabilities of LLM safety alignment by challenging models with non-natural language inputs, specifically ciphers. It provides a structured approach to uncover vulnerabilities in LLM safety mechanisms when faced with obfuscated or encrypted prompts.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://[YOUR_ICLR_2024_PAPER_URL_HERE]
  • mediumtopics#3
    Expand repository topics for better categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    alignment, chatgpt, gpt-4-0613, jailbreak, large-language-models, llm, security
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    alignment, chatgpt, gpt-4-0613, jailbreak, large-language-models, llm, security, llm-safety, llm-evaluation, adversarial-nlp, cipher-text, non-natural-language

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface RobustNLP/CipherChat
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Scale AI
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Scale AI · recommended 1×
  2. Surge AI · recommended 1×
  3. Snorkel AI · recommended 1×
  4. TextAttack · recommended 1×
  5. AdvBox · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to evaluate large language model safety alignment against adversarial or non-natural language inputs?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Scale AI
    2. Surge AI
    3. Snorkel AI
    4. TextAttack
    5. AdvBox

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named RobustNLP/CipherChat. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tool for systematically examining LLM generalization capabilities regarding security and jailbreaks?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Garak
    2. AdvBench
    3. LLM-Defender
    4. NVIDIA NeMo Guardrails
    5. OpenAI Evals
    6. Anthropic's Constitutional AI

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named RobustNLP/CipherChat. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of RobustNLP/CipherChat?
    pass
    AI named RobustNLP/CipherChat explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts RobustNLP/CipherChat in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named RobustNLP/CipherChat explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo RobustNLP/CipherChat solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named RobustNLP/CipherChat explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of RobustNLP/CipherChat. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/RobustNLP/CipherChat.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/RobustNLP/CipherChat)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/RobustNLP/CipherChat"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/RobustNLP/CipherChat.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

RobustNLP/CipherChat — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite