RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

mattpocock/dictionary-of-ai-coding

Default branch main · commit 276e3e09 · scanned 6/18/2026, 12:02:43 AM

GitHub: 2,230 stars · 263 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
17 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface mattpocock/dictionary-of-ai-coding, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai, artificial-intelligence, coding, dictionary, glossary, jargon, developer-tools, education, learning, machine-learning
  • highhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository's 'About' section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://www.aihero.dev/ai-coding-dictionary
  • highlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository root

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root with the text of a standard open-source license, such as the MIT License or CC-BY-4.0 for content.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface mattpocock/dictionary-of-ai-coding
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Google AI Glossary
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Google AI Glossary · recommended 1×
  2. IBM AI Glossary · recommended 1×
  3. Towards Data Science Glossary (on Medium) · recommended 1×
  4. Machine Learning Glossary by Google Developers · recommended 1×
  5. Wikipedia · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Struggling with AI coding jargon; need a resource to demystify common terms.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Google AI Glossary
    2. IBM AI Glossary
    3. Towards Data Science Glossary (on Medium)
    4. Machine Learning Glossary by Google Developers
    5. Wikipedia
    6. Hands-On Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras, and TensorFlow

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named mattpocock/dictionary-of-ai-coding. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for plain English explanations of AI development concepts and their practical implications.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Google AI Blog
    2. Towards Data Science
    3. IBM Watson Blog
    4. OpenAI Blog
    5. Analytics Vidhya
    6. Kaggle Learn
    7. 3Blue1Brown

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named mattpocock/dictionary-of-ai-coding. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of mattpocock/dictionary-of-ai-coding?
    pass
    AI did not name mattpocock/dictionary-of-ai-coding — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts mattpocock/dictionary-of-ai-coding in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named mattpocock/dictionary-of-ai-coding explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo mattpocock/dictionary-of-ai-coding solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name mattpocock/dictionary-of-ai-coding — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of mattpocock/dictionary-of-ai-coding. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/mattpocock/dictionary-of-ai-coding.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/mattpocock/dictionary-of-ai-coding)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/mattpocock/dictionary-of-ai-coding"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/mattpocock/dictionary-of-ai-coding.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

mattpocock/dictionary-of-ai-coding — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite