RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

erictli/scratch

Default branch main · commit a638f02b · scanned 5/22/2026, 5:01:55 AM

GitHub: 1,049 stars · 92 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
23 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface erictli/scratch, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 to clarify its purpose as a note-taking app

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Scratch
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Scratch: Offline Markdown Note-Taking App
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to improve AI categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    markdown, note-taking, offline-first, wysiwyg, cross-platform, electron, productivity, pkm, knowledge-management, ai-integration
  • mediumlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the root of the repository, for example, using the MIT License text.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface erictli/scratch
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Obsidian
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Obsidian · recommended 2×
  2. Joplin · recommended 2×
  3. Typora · recommended 2×
  4. Mark Text · recommended 2×
  5. Logseq · recommended 2×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are some good offline markdown note-taking apps with rich text editing and diagrams?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Obsidian
    2. Excalidraw
    3. Mermaid
    4. PlantUML
    5. Joplin
    6. Typora
    7. MathJax
    8. Mark Text
    9. Logseq
    10. Notable

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named erictli/scratch. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a local-first markdown editor that integrates with AI for editing and supports math equations.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Obsidian
    2. Text Generator
    3. Smart Connections
    4. OpenAI
    5. Typora
    6. ChatGPT
    7. Claude
    8. Joplin
    9. VS Code
    10. Markdown All in One
    11. Markdown Preview Enhanced
    12. Copilot
    13. CodeGPT
    14. Zettlr
    15. Mark Text
    16. Logseq

    AI recommended 16 alternatives but never named erictli/scratch. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of erictli/scratch?
    pass
    AI did not name erictli/scratch — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts erictli/scratch in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named erictli/scratch explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo erictli/scratch solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named erictli/scratch explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of erictli/scratch. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/erictli/scratch.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/erictli/scratch)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/erictli/scratch"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/erictli/scratch.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

erictli/scratch — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite