REPOGEO REPORT · LITE
junaid33/opensource.builders
Default branch master · commit 1a1cb7d9 · scanned 5/19/2026, 9:08:07 AM
GitHub: 1,305 stars · 189 forks
Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.
2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).
Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface junaid33/opensource.builders, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.
Action plan — copy-paste fixes
3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.
- hightopics#1Add relevant topics to the repository
Why:
COPY-PASTE FIXopen-source-alternatives, ai-agents, code-generation, skill-builder, software-comparison, developer-tools
- highlicense#2Add a LICENSE file to the repository
Why:
COPY-PASTE FIXCreate a `LICENSE` file in the repository root containing the text of the MIT License.
- highreadme#3Refine the README's opening sentence to clarify the 'Skill Builder' feature
Why:
CURRENTFind open-source alternatives to popular software, compare features side-by-side, and generate skills with code references that help AI build those features in your project.
COPY-PASTE FIXFind open-source alternatives to popular software, compare features side-by-side, and generate AI agent skills with code references that help AI build those features in your project. This platform uniquely enables you to create actionable 'skills' for your coding agents directly from open-source project features.
Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash
Category visibility — the real GEO test
Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?
Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.
- AlternativeTo · recommended 1×
- OSALT · recommended 1×
- SourceForge · recommended 1×
- GitHub Explore/Trending · recommended 1×
- It's FOSS · recommended 1×
- CATEGORY QUERYWhere can I find open-source alternatives to common proprietary software applications?you: not recommendedAI recommended (in order):
- AlternativeTo
- OSALT
- SourceForge
- GitHub Explore/Trending
- It's FOSS
- Slant
- Wikipedia
AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named junaid33/opensource.builders. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
- CATEGORY QUERYHow to generate code references for AI agents to build features from open-source projects?you: not recommendedAI recommended (in order):
- GitHub Copilot
- Sourcegraph
- CodeQL
- Tree-sitter
- OpenAI API
- ast module (Python)
- ts-morph
- go/ast
- clang
AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named junaid33/opensource.builders. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
Objective checks
Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.
- Metadata completenesswarn
Suggestion:
- README presencepass
Self-mention check
Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?
- Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of junaid33/opensource.builders?passAI named junaid33/opensource.builders explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- If a team adopts junaid33/opensource.builders in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?passAI named junaid33/opensource.builders explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- In one sentence, what problem does the repo junaid33/opensource.builders solve, and who is the primary audience?passAI did not name junaid33/opensource.builders — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
Embed your GEO score
Drop this badge into the README of junaid33/opensource.builders. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.
[](https://repogeo.com/en/r/junaid33/opensource.builders)<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/junaid33/opensource.builders"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/junaid33/opensource.builders.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses
junaid33/opensource.builders — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.
- Deep reports10 / month
- Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
- Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite