RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

matter-labs/awesome-zero-knowledge-proofs

Default branch master · commit c479feda · scanned 6/26/2026, 9:38:49 AM

GitHub: 5,805 stars · 918 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface matter-labs/awesome-zero-knowledge-proofs, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highhomepage#1
    Add a homepage URL to the repository's About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/matter-labs/awesome-zero-knowledge-proofs
  • hightopics#2
    Expand GitHub topics to include 'awesome-list' and 'learning'

    Why:

    CURRENT
    explaining-snarks, knowledge-proofs, snark, team-crypto, zk-snarks
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    explaining-snarks, knowledge-proofs, snark, team-crypto, zk-snarks, awesome-list, learning, education
  • mediumreadme#3
    Clarify the existing license in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## License
The licensing terms for this project are detailed in the [LICENSE](LICENSE) file.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface matter-labs/awesome-zero-knowledge-proofs
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ZKProof.org
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ZKProof.org · recommended 1×
  2. Awesome Zero Knowledge Proofs · recommended 1×
  3. circom · recommended 1×
  4. snarkjs · recommended 1×
  5. bellman · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find comprehensive resources to learn about zero-knowledge proofs and their use cases?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ZKProof.org
    2. Awesome Zero Knowledge Proofs
    3. circom
    4. snarkjs
    5. bellman
    6. gnark

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named matter-labs/awesome-zero-knowledge-proofs. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the key differences and trade-offs between various ZKP systems like SNARKs and STARKs?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Groth16
    2. Plonk
    3. Halo2
    4. Marlin
    5. Cairo (StarkWare)
    6. Winterfell (Facebook/Meta)
    7. SP1 (Succinct Labs)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named matter-labs/awesome-zero-knowledge-proofs. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of matter-labs/awesome-zero-knowledge-proofs?
    pass
    AI did not name matter-labs/awesome-zero-knowledge-proofs — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts matter-labs/awesome-zero-knowledge-proofs in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named matter-labs/awesome-zero-knowledge-proofs explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo matter-labs/awesome-zero-knowledge-proofs solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name matter-labs/awesome-zero-knowledge-proofs — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of matter-labs/awesome-zero-knowledge-proofs. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/matter-labs/awesome-zero-knowledge-proofs.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/matter-labs/awesome-zero-knowledge-proofs)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/matter-labs/awesome-zero-knowledge-proofs"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/matter-labs/awesome-zero-knowledge-proofs.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

matter-labs/awesome-zero-knowledge-proofs — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite