RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

transitive-bullshit/OpenOpenAI

Default branch main · commit 5b6a2a19 · scanned 5/29/2026, 11:37:42 PM

GitHub: 550 stars · 50 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface transitive-bullshit/OpenOpenAI, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README intro to emphasize 'drop-in replacement' and 'private deployment'

    Why:

    CURRENT
    This project is a self-hosted version of OpenAI's new stateful Assistants API.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    OpenOpenAI is a self-hosted, wire-compatible implementation of OpenAI's stateful Assistants API, designed as a drop-in replacement for local development and private deployments.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add more specific topics related to local and private AI services

    Why:

    CURRENT
    assistants, gpts, openai, openai-api, self-hosted
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    assistants, gpts, openai, openai-api, self-hosted, local-ai, ai-server, private-ai, open-source-ai-api, drop-in-replacement
  • lowhomepage#3
    Add the repository URL as the homepage

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/transitive-bullshit/OpenOpenAI

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface transitive-bullshit/OpenOpenAI
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
go-skynet/LocalAI
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. go-skynet/LocalAI · recommended 1×
  2. ollama/ollama · recommended 1×
  3. LM Studio · recommended 1×
  4. open-webui/open-webui · recommended 1×
  5. PrivateGPT/PrivateGPT · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I run a private, self-hosted AI assistant service compatible with existing tools?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LocalAI (go-skynet/LocalAI)
    2. Ollama (ollama/ollama)
    3. LM Studio
    4. OpenWebUI (open-webui/open-webui)
    5. PrivateGPT (PrivateGPT/PrivateGPT)
    6. Haystack (deepset-ai/haystack)
    7. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    8. Hugging Face Transformers (huggingface/transformers)

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named transitive-bullshit/OpenOpenAI. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an open-source alternative to a popular stateful conversational AI assistant API.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Rasa Open Source (RasaHQ/rasa)
    2. DeepPavlov (deepmipt/DeepPavlov)
    3. Open Assistant (LAION-AI/Open-Assistant)
    4. ParlAI (facebookresearch/ParlAI)
    5. Botpress (botpress/botpress)

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named transitive-bullshit/OpenOpenAI. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of transitive-bullshit/OpenOpenAI?
    pass
    AI named transitive-bullshit/OpenOpenAI explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts transitive-bullshit/OpenOpenAI in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named transitive-bullshit/OpenOpenAI explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo transitive-bullshit/OpenOpenAI solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name transitive-bullshit/OpenOpenAI — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of transitive-bullshit/OpenOpenAI. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/transitive-bullshit/OpenOpenAI.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/transitive-bullshit/OpenOpenAI)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/transitive-bullshit/OpenOpenAI"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/transitive-bullshit/OpenOpenAI.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

transitive-bullshit/OpenOpenAI — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite