RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

frutik/awesome-search

Default branch master · commit ea2aaec2 · scanned 5/9/2026, 10:37:56 PM

GitHub: 1,536 stars · 137 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface frutik/awesome-search, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening to clearly state it's a curated resource list

    Why:

    CURRENT
    I've been building e-commerce search applications for more than ten years. Below is a list of some publications, conferences, and books that have inspired me, grouped by topic.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This is a curated collection of essential resources, publications, conferences, and books for anyone building or researching search applications, especially in e-commerce. It covers everything from classic lexical search to advanced semantic and hybrid approaches.
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root with the content of the MIT License. (e.g., copy from https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT)
  • mediumabout#3
    Refine the 'About' description to emphasize 'curated collection'

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Awesome Search - this is all about the (e-commerce, but not only) search and its awesomeness
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A curated collection of essential resources, publications, and tools for building and researching search applications, covering lexical, semantic, and hybrid search.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface frutik/awesome-search
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Elasticsearch
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Elasticsearch · recommended 2×
  2. Pinecone · recommended 2×
  3. Weaviate · recommended 2×
  4. Hugging Face Transformers · recommended 1×
  5. sentence-transformers · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking resources on implementing effective semantic search and query understanding for better results.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Hugging Face Transformers
    2. sentence-transformers
    3. Elasticsearch
    4. Pinecone
    5. Weaviate
    6. OpenAI Embeddings API
    7. Faiss
    8. Haystack

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named frutik/awesome-search. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find resources comparing lexical, semantic, and hybrid search approaches for my application?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Elastic
    2. Elasticsearch
    3. Pinecone
    4. Hugging Face
    5. Weaviate
    6. arXiv
    7. Medium
    8. Towards Data Science
    9. YouTube
    10. Data Science Dojo
    11. freeCodeCamp

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named frutik/awesome-search. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of frutik/awesome-search?
    pass
    AI named frutik/awesome-search explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts frutik/awesome-search in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named frutik/awesome-search explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo frutik/awesome-search solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named frutik/awesome-search explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of frutik/awesome-search. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/frutik/awesome-search.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/frutik/awesome-search)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/frutik/awesome-search"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/frutik/awesome-search.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

frutik/awesome-search — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite