RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Jamailar/RedBox

Default branch main · commit 5bae833c · scanned 5/30/2026, 2:56:29 AM

GitHub: 1,010 stars · 140 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Jamailar/RedBox, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Strengthen the README's opening statement to clarify unique identity

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The current README starts with centered paragraphs and potentially badges before the main value proposition '面向小红书创作者的本地化 AI 创作工作台'.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a prominent H1 at the very top of the README, before any badges or images, like: `# RedBox: 面向小红书创作者的本地化 AI 创作工作台`
  • mediumtopics#2
    Refine and expand GitHub topics for better categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai, ai-agents, claude-design, content-creation, gpt-image-2, harness-engineering, hermes, hermes-agent, openclaw, skills, xiaohongshu-scraper
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai, content-creation, image-generation, social-media-marketing, xiaohongshu, xiaohongshu-tool, ai-assistant, content-automation, gpt-image-2, openclaw, desktop-app
  • lowreadme#3
    Clarify the project's license in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a section or line in the README, e.g., `## 📄 许可协议` followed by `本项目使用 [Your specific license name(s) here] 许可协议。详情请参阅 [LICENSE 文件](LICENSE)。`

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Jamailar/RedBox
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Canva
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Canva · recommended 2×
  2. Adobe Express · recommended 2×
  3. Simplified · recommended 2×
  4. Midjourney · recommended 1×
  5. ChatGPT (with DALL-E 3) · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What AI tools help generate images and automate content for social media platforms?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Canva
    2. Adobe Express
    3. Midjourney
    4. ChatGPT (with DALL-E 3)
    5. Simplified
    6. Jasper
    7. Later

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named Jamailar/RedBox. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Which desktop AI tools simplify content creation and image arrangement for social media posts?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Canva
    2. Adobe Express
    3. Simplified
    4. Lumen5
    5. Descript

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named Jamailar/RedBox. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Jamailar/RedBox?
    pass
    AI did not name Jamailar/RedBox — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Jamailar/RedBox in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Jamailar/RedBox explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Jamailar/RedBox solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named Jamailar/RedBox explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Jamailar/RedBox. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Jamailar/RedBox.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Jamailar/RedBox)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Jamailar/RedBox"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Jamailar/RedBox.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Jamailar/RedBox — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite