RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

vmoranv/jshookmcp

Default branch master · commit 3adc8e62 · scanned 5/18/2026, 6:36:50 PM

GitHub: 1,512 stars · 418 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface vmoranv/jshookmcp, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README opening to clarify 'MCP' and core domain

    Why:

    CURRENT
    An MCP server that gives AI agents **402 tools across 36 domains** for JavaScript analysis and security research — browser automation, CDP debugging, network interception, JS hooks, LLM-powered code analysis, process/memory forensics, WASM reverse engineering, source-map reconstruction, AST transforms, and composite workflows in a single server.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This is an **MCP (Model Context Protocol) server** that gives AI agents **402 tools across 36 domains** for JavaScript analysis and security research — browser automation, CDP debugging, network interception, JS hooks, LLM-powered code analysis, process/memory forensics, WASM reverse engineering, source-map reconstruction, AST transforms, and composite workflows in a single server.
  • mediumabout#2
    Update repository description for clarity and specificity

    Why:

    CURRENT
    js hook toolkit that all you need
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    An MCP (Model Context Protocol) server providing 400+ AI-powered tools for JavaScript analysis, security research, and browser automation.
  • mediumtopics#3
    Add explicit AI/LLM and Model Context Protocol topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    browser-automation, debugging, deobfuscation, js-reverse, mcp, network-analysis, reverse-engineering, security-analysis
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    browser-automation, debugging, deobfuscation, js-reverse, mcp, network-analysis, reverse-engineering, security-analysis, llm-tools, ai-agents, model-context-protocol

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface vmoranv/jshookmcp
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
JSNice
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. JSNice · recommended 1×
  2. Jalangi2 · recommended 1×
  3. CodeQL · recommended 1×
  4. Obfuscator.io Deobfuscator · recommended 1×
  5. MalwareBazaar · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best AI-powered tools for JavaScript security analysis and deobfuscation?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. JSNice
    2. Jalangi2
    3. CodeQL
    4. Obfuscator.io Deobfuscator
    5. MalwareBazaar
    6. Any.Run

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named vmoranv/jshookmcp. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    I need a comprehensive toolkit for JavaScript reverse engineering and browser automation tasks.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Playwright
    2. Puppeteer
    3. Selenium WebDriver
    4. Cypress
    5. Frida
    6. mitmproxy

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named vmoranv/jshookmcp. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of vmoranv/jshookmcp?
    pass
    AI named vmoranv/jshookmcp explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts vmoranv/jshookmcp in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named vmoranv/jshookmcp explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo vmoranv/jshookmcp solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name vmoranv/jshookmcp — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of vmoranv/jshookmcp. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/vmoranv/jshookmcp.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/vmoranv/jshookmcp)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/vmoranv/jshookmcp"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/vmoranv/jshookmcp.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

vmoranv/jshookmcp — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite