REPOGEO REPORT · LITE
msoedov/agentic_security
Default branch main · commit 42615e50 · scanned 6/29/2026, 10:31:24 AM
GitHub: 1,912 stars · 267 forks
Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.
2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).
Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface msoedov/agentic_security, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.
Action plan — copy-paste fixes
3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.
- highreadme#1Reposition the README's opening to highlight the 'agentic' methodology
Why:
CURRENTAn open-source vulnerability scanner for Agent Workflows and Large Language Models (LLMs) Protecting AI systems from jailbreaks, fuzzing, and multimodal attacks.
COPY-PASTE FIXAn open-source **agentic** vulnerability scanner for Agent Workflows and Large Language Models (LLMs), leveraging autonomous agents to protect AI systems from jailbreaks, fuzzing, and multimodal attacks.
- mediumcomparison#2Add a dedicated 'Comparison' or 'Why Agentic Security?' section to the README
Why:
COPY-PASTE FIXA new section titled 'Why Agentic Security? (vs. Giskard, LLM Guard, Garak)' or similar, outlining key differentiators like its agentic approach, multi-step attack simulation, and multimodal capabilities.
- lowtopics#3Expand the 'Topics' list with more specific terms related to agentic AI and security
Why:
CURRENTagent-framework, agent-security, ai-red-team, llm-evaluation, llm-evaluation-framework, llm-fuzzer, llm-fuzzer-aggregator, llm-fuzzing, llm-guardrails, llm-jailbreaks, llm-scanner, llm-security, llm-vulnerabilities, prompt-testing
COPY-PASTE FIXagent-framework, agent-security, ai-red-team, llm-evaluation, llm-evaluation-framework, llm-fuzzer, llm-fuzzer-aggregator, llm-fuzzing, llm-guardrails, llm-jailbreaks, llm-scanner, llm-security, llm-vulnerabilities, prompt-testing, agentic-ai-security, autonomous-red-teaming, multimodal-llm-attacks, rl-based-attacks
Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash
Category visibility — the real GEO test
Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?
Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.
- Giskard · recommended 1×
- LLM Guard · recommended 1×
- OWASP LLM Top 10 Project · recommended 1×
- MITRE ATLAS · recommended 1×
- PromptInject · recommended 1×
- CATEGORY QUERYHow to scan large language models for vulnerabilities and potential jailbreaks?you: not recommendedAI recommended (in order):
- Giskard
- LLM Guard
- OWASP LLM Top 10 Project
- MITRE ATLAS
- PromptInject
- Scale AI
- Surge AI
- LangChain
- LlamaIndex
- Semantic Kernel
- OpenAI's moderation endpoint
AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named msoedov/agentic_security. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
- CATEGORY QUERYWhat tools are available for AI red teaming and LLM security fuzzing?you: not recommendedAI recommended (in order):
- Garak
- LLM-Security
- Adversarial GLUE (AdvGLUE)
- OpenAI Evals
- Robustness Gym
- Microsoft Counterfit
- IBM Adversarial Robustness Toolbox (ART)
AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named msoedov/agentic_security. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
Objective checks
Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.
- Metadata completenesspass
- README presencepass
Self-mention check
Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?
- Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of msoedov/agentic_security?passAI did not name msoedov/agentic_security — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- If a team adopts msoedov/agentic_security in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?passAI named msoedov/agentic_security explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- In one sentence, what problem does the repo msoedov/agentic_security solve, and who is the primary audience?passAI named msoedov/agentic_security explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
Embed your GEO score
Drop this badge into the README of msoedov/agentic_security. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.
Live preview[](https://repogeo.com/en/r/msoedov/agentic_security)<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/msoedov/agentic_security"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/msoedov/agentic_security.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses
msoedov/agentic_security — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.
- Deep reports10 / month
- Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
- Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite