RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

WPeace-HcH/WPeChatGPT

Default branch main · commit e4fac886 · scanned 5/20/2026, 10:47:02 PM

GitHub: 1,297 stars · 186 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface WPeace-HcH/WPeChatGPT, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 to explicitly state its purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # WPeChatGPT
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # WPeChatGPT: An IDA Pro Plugin for AI-Powered Binary Analysis
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root with the chosen open-source license text (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, GPL-3.0).
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository's About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add `https://github.com/WPeace-HcH/WPeChatGPT` (or a dedicated project website if one exists) to the repository's homepage field.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface WPeace-HcH/WPeChatGPT
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
IDA Pro
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. IDA Pro · recommended 2×
  2. BinDiff · recommended 2×
  3. Hex-Rays Decompiler · recommended 1×
  4. NationalSecurityAgency/ghidra · recommended 1×
  5. joxr/Diaphora · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best AI-powered tools for reverse engineering and binary file analysis?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. IDA Pro
    2. Hex-Rays Decompiler
    3. Ghidra (NationalSecurityAgency/ghidra)
    4. BinDiff
    5. Diaphora (joxr/Diaphora)
    6. Intezer Analyze
    7. MalwareBazaar
    8. VirusTotal
    9. YARA (VirusTotal/yara)
    10. Angr (angr/angr)
    11. DeepIDA
    12. DeepGhidra

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named WPeace-HcH/WPeChatGPT. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I use AI to accelerate vulnerability detection and function understanding in binaries?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. IDA Pro
    2. Ghidra
    3. BinDiff
    4. Diaphora
    5. angr
    6. DeepBinDiff
    7. Gemini
    8. AlphaDiff
    9. PANDA
    10. OpenAI Codex
    11. GitHub Copilot

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named WPeace-HcH/WPeChatGPT. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of WPeace-HcH/WPeChatGPT?
    pass
    AI named WPeace-HcH/WPeChatGPT explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts WPeace-HcH/WPeChatGPT in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named WPeace-HcH/WPeChatGPT explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo WPeace-HcH/WPeChatGPT solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named WPeace-HcH/WPeChatGPT explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of WPeace-HcH/WPeChatGPT. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/WPeace-HcH/WPeChatGPT.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/WPeace-HcH/WPeChatGPT)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/WPeace-HcH/WPeChatGPT"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/WPeace-HcH/WPeChatGPT.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

WPeace-HcH/WPeChatGPT — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite